Subject:
|
Re: Dirty little secret (was Re: New Interurban/Trolley model, perfect for those downtown scenes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:37:38 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@#Spamcake#cmasi.chem.tulane.edu
|
Viewed:
|
2421 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric Kingsley wrote:
>
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > I personally think 4 stud spacing is closer (by a hair) to the motor truck
> > spacing (which is somewhere between 3 and 4, for some strange reason I never
> > did determine. Anyone know why or have an entertaining speculation?
>
> Well I personally find this spacing quite frustrateing. So much so that I use
> 2 motors on the engines that I have designed so far because I just don't like
> the look of the dummy truck mixed with the motor truck. They just don't look
> right together.
>
> Part of me wants to say this was some sort of ploy by TLC to get us to dubble
> up on motors but I doubt that was it. I don't know if there is something about
> the geometries inside the motor (Never opened one up) that restricts the
> spacing or possibly they found this spacing best for keeping contact on corners
> and points?
>
> I don't know really but it is rather annoying and one of my current pet-peeves
> with TLC.
>
> Eric Kingsley
>
> The New England LEGO Users Group
> http://www.nelug.org/
I always thought the space between the wheels on a motor was 3 studs. The
problem with a dummy motor is that if the truck has 3 studs between the wheels
then the bogie plate nub is of center.
Chris
--
PGP public key available upon request.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
70 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
