To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9562
9561  |  9563
Subject: 
Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:02:50 GMT
Viewed: 
663 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Sean Forbes writes:

Something similar, to add to the off-topic, copyrights, I've been told that
either the Big Mac or Whopper is knows as  the Big King in Australia due to a
established eatery already using the name.

The Big M has had fast food franchising (burgers) to themselves in Australia.
So the Big Mac is the Big Mac.

Only recently have Burger King started expansion. But I believe someone local
had rights to the franchise name 'Burger King'. When Burger King started up
operations they had to call the stores 'Hungry Jacks'. So there are two names
for the same style of takeaway store.
You might be thinking of the Pulp Fiction conversation.

pete.w



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King"
 
(...) Actually, the story I heard was that as Fast food McDonald's moved into England and Scotland, the found a small restaurant near one of the desired sites named McDonalds. It wasn't too large or high class (I'll get to that later) but I also (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

62 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR