Subject:
|
Re: What's in a name? ( Potter, Plagiarism, and Trademark)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:15:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
719 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
>
> If the word exists, that's one thing, but
> > if a clone brick competitor produced very similar (though not identical)
> > toys and called them LEGO, would there be a trademark issue?
> >
> > Dave!
>
>
> Yes, Lego would have a case because it would create confusion in the
> public's mind. Less clear cut would be a recording company and a computer
> manufacturer having the same name (Apple).
Or, for example, a boy wizard and a boy wizard? 8^)
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
62 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
