Subject:
|
Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:14:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
640 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> As noted above, "perhaps she has a case, perhaps she doesn't." I'm just not
> going to condemn Rowling based on what Stouffer had to say.
Same here. I'm really just intrigued by the whole thing, since it's a
nifty string of coincidences even if no plagiarism is involved. No slur
intended toward either author, of course!
> The rest is grandstanding for the public.
Yeah, that assertion is pretty hard to refute! 8^)
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King"
|
| (...) As noted above, "perhaps she has a case, perhaps she doesn't." I'm just not going to condemn Rowling based on what Stouffer had to say. Plagiarism, which is what Stouffer is implying to get public sympathy and promote herself, and trademark (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
62 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
