To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 8243
8242  |  8244
Subject: 
Re: Harry Potter?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:07:02 GMT
Viewed: 
988 times
  
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:

In lugnet.castle, Frank Filz writes:

There's an even worse "copy" of Lord of the Rings - The Iron Tower
trilogy by Dennis L. McKiernan. It was explained to me once that this
resulted from McKiernan having written a sequel to Lord of the Rings,
and having it rejected as such, but the publisher liked the book - so,
McKiernan had to write the back story for his sequel... The Iron Tower
trilogy was MUCH more of a rip off than Sword of Shanara.

Frank

There were very serious talks about his work becoming an official extension
of Tolkien's work (anything is better than Christopher Tolkien out-Bilboing
his father with meandering editing).  So, yes, McKiernan's work was
originally intended as a pastiche.  From the standpoint of it esentially
being intended as a derivative work, it at least had an original story, and
hardly matches the scale of wholesale plaigarism that Brooks indulges in.

But the Iron Tower trilogy which was written to give the base series for
the later books to rest on had incredible correlation with Lord of the
Rings. It seemed like every major scene had a parallel in Lord of the
Rings.

FUT: lugnet.off-topic.fun

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Harry Potter?
 
(...) Brooks had scene-for-scene, character-for-character matches (in the same sequence as LOTR) - geez, a fellowship with four little guys, one dwarf, one elf, two men, and a wizard, for heaven's sake. He just added new names, and that was about (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Harry Potter?
 
(...) There were very serious talks about his work becoming an official extension of Tolkien's work (anything is better than Christopher Tolkien out-Bilboing his father with meandering editing). So, yes, McKiernan's work was originally intended as a (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)

62 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR