To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 8211
8210  |  8212
Subject: 
Re: Harry Potter?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:36:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1930 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

> > I haven't read any of these cultishly popular books, so I'm in no position
> > to judge or make other comment...

> I wouldn't call #1 best-sellers as cultish - fadish, perhaps.

  I didn't mean it as insultingly as it probably came across. Think of it
merely as an outsider's perception of an endlessly popular phenomenon.  It's
not a cult, obviously; I mean, it's not Pokemon, for pity's sake!  8^)

> The web site of the author of Larry Potter is extremely self-serving to say
> the least (www.realmuggles.com), but she may have a trademark (not
> copyright) case.  The lawyers will have a field day, in any case.

  I know that none of us is a copyright lawyer, but, if she wins, might
Larry's author be entitled to royalties on all things Potter?  That could
spell zillions and zillions of dollars!

> But then, the ultimate in fantasy plaigarism is still around - Sword of
> Shanara, so who knows.

  Similarly, Donaldson's Chronicles of Thomas Covenant borrow quite
liberally (as does much modern fantasy) from Tolkien (who himself was a
borrower, after a fashion!)

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Harry Potter?
 
(...) I rather enjoyed the Harry Potter books, but then I'm a Tolkien cultist. :-) (...) Trademark infringement would most likely get her a piece of the action. (...) Borrowing or being inspired by, and out-and-out character-for-character and (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Harry Potter?
 
(...) I wouldn't call #1 best-sellers as cultish - fadish, perhaps. The web site of the author of Larry Potter is extremely self-serving to say the least (www.realmuggles.com), but she may have a trademark (not copyright) case. The lawyers will have (...) (26 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)

62 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR