To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 8211
8210  |  8212
Subject: 
Re: Harry Potter?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:36:59 GMT
Viewed: 
837 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

I haven't read any of these cultishly popular books, so I'm in no position
to judge or make other comment...

I wouldn't call #1 best-sellers as cultish - fadish, perhaps.

  I didn't mean it as insultingly as it probably came across. Think of it
merely as an outsider's perception of an endlessly popular phenomenon.  It's
not a cult, obviously; I mean, it's not Pokemon, for pity's sake!  8^)

The web site of the author of Larry Potter is extremely self-serving to say
the least (www.realmuggles.com), but she may have a trademark (not
copyright) case.  The lawyers will have a field day, in any case.

  I know that none of us is a copyright lawyer, but, if she wins, might
Larry's author be entitled to royalties on all things Potter?  That could
spell zillions and zillions of dollars!

But then, the ultimate in fantasy plaigarism is still around - Sword of
Shanara, so who knows.

  Similarly, Donaldson's Chronicles of Thomas Covenant borrow quite
liberally (as does much modern fantasy) from Tolkien (who himself was a
borrower, after a fashion!)

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Harry Potter?
 
(...) I rather enjoyed the Harry Potter books, but then I'm a Tolkien cultist. :-) (...) Trademark infringement would most likely get her a piece of the action. (...) Borrowing or being inspired by, and out-and-out character-for-character and (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Harry Potter?
 
(...) I wouldn't call #1 best-sellers as cultish - fadish, perhaps. The web site of the author of Larry Potter is extremely self-serving to say the least (www.realmuggles.com), but she may have a trademark (not copyright) case. The lawyers will have (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)

62 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR