Subject:
|
Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:23:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
353 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> I'll chime in here also as being sick of this. Part of me does want to
> slap both participants. Part of me realizes that much as I hate to
> single out folks, Scott seems to contribute almost nothing to Lugnet,
I have made the choice only to post in a couple of groups. I read a great
deal, but LUGENT is not the place it used to be. I agree that Larry does
post more than me. The difference is, when I post outside this group I try
to be 100% constructive. I have to be, or LUGNET's airhead exercises his
vendetta on me. Larry winds all sorts of people up in all sorts of ways. You
would be amazed at the e-mails I get from time-to-time.
Take a look at the thread which started this. Read all the posts up to the
point where Larry broke the rules. Tell me what I did wrong?
>
> except for an occasional interesting .debate post, but it's getting hard
> to find the wheat amongst the chaff. I'm not sure if he still sells, and
> I did used to appreciate those posts, but I either haven't seen a Scott
> Arthur sale/auction post in ages or something.
I don't - not time. The economic slow down gives me less motivation to make
time to sell (to be honest).
> I haven't really read the
> bit in lugnet.lego.direct so I can't really comment on that.
>
> I would like to see both participants spend more time actually
> participating in the LEGO community. Larry certainly does, but I'd like
> to see more. Larry do you ever build for yourself anymore? Your kits are
> interesting, but I'd love to see more building (says the guy who spends
> so much time buying and sorting he hasn't built much...). Scott, do you
> ever build? I can't recall any posts about your building.
Oh, I do. I built my 1st set last night in a long time... Summer has now
well and truly ended here. We have quite a few kids visiting over Xmas and I
am trying to put together some trains for them.
>
> I think at this point that I would be in favor of banning both Scott and
> Larry from .debate, and putting them on notice for the rest of Lugnet. I
> would like to then see some kind of probation which would allow the
> banning to be rescinded (which I'm sure Larry would easily complete,
> Scott, can you commit to actually contributing to the LUG community
> here?).
>
> I have called in the past for .debate to be closed. I still wonder about
> that, but I also do read the debates with interest. Perhaps what we need
> is just a way for folks to complain about individuals, and when X (5?)
> people make a complaint, that individual is banned from .debate until
> they do Y (perhaps those making a complaint get to vote the person back
> in after watching them participate in the rest of Lugnet in a positive
> fashion?).
Like I say above, I always try to be positive. I do not bicker in other
groups. Others want me to...
Scott A
>
> Incidentally, I'd be inclined to "complain" about folks who drag every
> debate into the religion area in such a way as to stifle the original
> debate. Too many debates have got mired down in religious yammering (I
> won't call much of it debate, debate relies on the ability to apply
> logic, all too often religious "debate"
> heads in the direction where you can't debate it ["God told me X" "How
> do you know God told you X, what if God told me Y" "But the Bible
> says..." as one example]).
>
> Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
|
| I'll chime in here also as being sick of this. Part of me does want to slap both participants. Part of me realizes that much as I hate to single out folks, Scott seems to contribute almost nothing to Lugnet, except for an occasional interesting (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
