To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14891
14890  |  14892
Subject: 
Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:03:37 GMT
Viewed: 
506 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lawrence Wilkes writes:

And whilst you (and they) might want to debate who started any particular >arguement, the fact is that the other is
always as guilty for simply perpetuating it.

There's really nothing to debate. Scott's the twit who starts trouble
whereever he goes. Go see lego.direct, for example, where his hateful slime
caused a great deal of hurt within LD. My only chargable offense is that I
let him get to me too easily.

Like Chris said... he just keeps on getting worse and worse until I snap.

Lugnet is better off without Scott Arthur. He contributes little or nothing
positive and causes trouble wherever he goes. Banning him will generate a
great deal of peace and quiet. Banning me means you're still stuck with his
bile.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
 
(...) You know how this line of reasoning ends, right? Some sort of discussion may well ensue to ban you both. Not one or the other, both. I wouldn't support anything else (or less) -- this is a "it takes two to tango" kinda thing. I will admit to (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
 
(...) In the thread Larry mentions, I questioned a company who was apparently noisily giving a token amount to the WTC charity. I questioned their motives. Tim and John claimed that perhaps I was being insensitive. Perhaps I was. I welcome both John (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
 
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:GnCxDG.JGr@lugnet.com... (...) No. I agree. Asked pretty much the same the other day (URL) no surprise that ignored it and carried on arguing. What is most annoying is that it seems (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR