Subject:
|
Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:58:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
578 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lawrence Wilkes writes:
>
> > And whilst you (and they) might want to debate who started any particular >arguement, the fact is that the other is
> > always as guilty for simply perpetuating it.
>
> There's really nothing to debate. Scott's the twit who starts trouble
> whereever he goes. Go see lego.direct, for example, where his hateful slime
> caused a great deal of hurt within LD.
In the thread Larry mentions, I questioned a company who was apparently
noisily giving a token amount to the WTC charity. I questioned their
motives. Tim and John claimed that perhaps I was being insensitive. Perhaps I
was. I welcome both John and Tim's opinion (although not the tone). But I do
not want to be lectured to by Larry on this, as he has already made his
views clear on those seeking to gain from 911:
==+==
Dan:
> I think it's just plain sick! Any person wishing to buy, sell, trade
> and/or somehow turn a profit from debris soaked with the blood of their
> countrymen is worthless scum in my opinion. Larry:
OK, I think excessive profiteering is a bit despicable, yes. But ponder
this. I would like to have a small piece of the WTC because I want a tangible
reminder of this tragedy, something to spark discussion with my kids or
grandkids, and don't ever want to forget that horrid day.
==+==
No doubt, if one is willing to pay a premium, a blood soaked piece of debris
can be had?
Scott A
> My only chargable offense is that I
> let him get to me too easily.
>
> Like Chris said... he just keeps on getting worse and worse until I snap.
>
> Lugnet is better off without Scott Arthur. He contributes little or nothing
> positive and causes trouble wherever he goes. Banning him will generate a
> great deal of peace and quiet. Banning me means you're still stuck with his
> bile.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
|
| NO NO NO NO NO!!! Don't you see the point of all of our posts expressing our COMPLETE DISGUST with the Scott and Larry Show???!?!!!?! All you're doing here is continuing it with half a dozen more PETTY BICKERING POSTS amed at Larry. Grow up, get a (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: It's brawl night in the kiddie pool
|
| (...) There's really nothing to debate. Scott's the twit who starts trouble whereever he goes. Go see lego.direct, for example, where his hateful slime caused a great deal of hurt within LD. My only chargable offense is that I let him get to me too (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
