Debate : 10224


Off-Topic / Debate / 10224	10223 \| 10225

Subject:	Re: Inter-racial, Inter-religious, Inter-national relationships
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sat, 5 May 2001 12:48:27 GMT
Viewed:	382 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes: > I don't call that progress, I call that moving BACKWARDS. The question simply > shouldn't be there AT ALL. I agree. We leave it blank (along with a lot of other stuff like how many bathrooms we have and other marketing research kind of stuff...) on the census form. This has earned us a followup visit the last two times. ++Lar

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Inter-racial, Inter-religious, Inter-national relationships
(...) Say what one will about the challenges and problems now facing South Africa, but they knew that the very first thing they needed to do with the 1996 census was eliminate any category of race or ethnicity on the forms. Granted, they're much (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Inter-racial, Inter-religious, Inter-national relationships
(...) I don't call that progress, I call that moving BACKWARDS. The question simply shouldn't be there AT ALL. -- Tom Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

41 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search