| |
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Tim Courtney writes:
> Mark, settle down. You're being a bit too demanding here, even though you
> might not see it. You posted a public letter, so you should expect others
> to reply. If you didn't want other replies, then don't post publicly. You
> can't get upset when someone other than Todd replies.
True, point taken - I was more to borrow a word "grated" that the reply had
really nothing to do with the post - I know it would be impossible to keep
people posting a reply to it, and posting that would only make people reply
more - which it did. If it had been more topical to what this thread was
about, then I would not have even blinked or replyied, my time trying to
have an adult conversation about if Lego can post across the board is over,
it will only be a waste of time at this point.
<snip>
>
> I know both of you are adults, but you are both acting like little children
> here. 'You shut up,' 'no, you!!' Look at yourselves. Mark - granted Jude
> has been a little snide in his comments here, you don't have to come back at
> him that way. Take a chill pill.
I was trying to make a point that that reply was wrong, For what I was going
to post see below(1).
<snip>
> I don't think you 'attacked' Henry, but at the same time you tried to
> silence him in a public thread, where he has just as much right (granted by
> Todd for running Lugnet and approving him to post) as the next person. You
> can't impose your unreasonable expectations on who can post where, just
> because you're Mark Papenfuss.
LOL, same as above - but thank you for agreeing that I did not attack Henry.
That is not what I did. I was not trying to silence him, just pointing out
that this was not the thread it belonged on. And the part about it not being
an open letter was a last second addition (not the best addition granted)-
because it was not an open letter, I was not looking for others (other than
Todd's) opinion on what I had posted, I knew that others would post on it,
it is a given an shoul - and was expected.
<snip>
>
> Mark - though we share an opinion about the rule, you've been a bit
> unreasonable throughout this entire discussion. I hope you see that. Eric
> personally attacking you may have added to the frustration, but that's
> something you and him need to deal with, if this is by any chance effecting
> your attitude posting here.
>
> Take a chill pill dude, you've been a tad too demanding here. • see (1) below
>
> Note, I am NOT telling you to shut up.
Its ok man, *you* could tell me to shut up, because I know if you did you
would not be doing it for the wrong reason, like Jude did. Jude was the one
trying to silence somebody here - it was ironic that while wrongly accusing
me of doing it, that he would do it himself - I just find that funny.
>
> -Tim
lol, ok Tim. Yes, like I told you last night, what Eric did was upsetting,
and I took it for what it was worth - worthless jabber from somebody who
means nothing to me. And reference the part about posting on this thread
above :)~
(1) NOW - to why I replied to Juse the way I did:
This was done for a reason, I treadtd Jude like Jude treated me. I wanted
Jude to say "what an asshole", and hopefully it would dawn on him that when
I read his post I myself thought "what an asshole". I do not know Jude, all
I know is Jude came out of left field with that - and I dished Jude what
Jude dished to me. There is no need for any of it, and the fact that you
said it was perfet, I had hoped that by the time I returned home somebody
(hopefully Jude) would have replied saying something along those lines. I am
calm, I was very careful when i replied to that post - I was very careful to
return exactly what I was given. Jude was very incorrect in what he said,
and I was scratching my head as to how I attacked Henry.
Mark P.
mfuss903@aol.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A letter to Todd
|
| (...) Uh oh. Now the uproar is going to continue because you're only allowed to profane on LUGNET if you're in the good graces of the powers that be. And you're not. So I predict your posting privs will be yanked and you'll scream about being (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
| (...) Mark, settle down. You're being a bit too demanding here, even though you might not see it. You posted a public letter, so you should expect others to reply. If you didn't want other replies, then don't post publicly. You can't get upset when (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
