| |
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Mark Papenfuss writes:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, Jude Beaudin writes:
> > If you want to talk to Todd, email him, especially if you do not want others
> > to reply.
> If you have been paying attention, Todd's response rate is below 50%, he is
> a busy man - And if I have been attacked in public, then I reply in public,
> got it? If not - oh well.
Mark, settle down. You're being a bit too demanding here, even though you
might not see it. You posted a public letter, so you should expect others
to reply. If you didn't want other replies, then don't post publicly. You
can't get upset when someone other than Todd replies.
> > Personally I wish you would shut up about LEGO's rights on LUGNET unless you
> > have something constructive to say. Such as something like, "Gee Todd, I
> > wish you would have informed us this was coming first because I feel that
> > the solution is..."
> Personally I feel the same way about you... You have added nothing
> constructive here in your post - so according to you, why post it? Just
> "Shut up" - and I am quoting you on that.
I know both of you are adults, but you are both acting like little children
here. 'You shut up,' 'no, you!!' Look at yourselves. Mark - granted Jude
has been a little snide in his comments here, you don't have to come back at
him that way. Take a chill pill.
> > But now on top of all that you post a letter publicly then attack someone
> > who replies to you.
> Where did I attack Henry? Where? Please, point it out to me- I was very
> nice, said my pleases and thank yous and all that., now you on the other
> hand say things like "shut up" - is that helpful or hurtful? Go take a look
> in the mirror and tell yourself to "shut up" and then ask yourself - was
> that a nice thing? Get back to me on the answer to that.
I don't think you 'attacked' Henry, but at the same time you tried to
silence him in a public thread, where he has just as much right (granted by
Todd for running Lugnet and approving him to post) as the next person. You
can't impose your unreasonable expectations on who can post where, just
because you're Mark Papenfuss.
> > I have alot more to say but Mom taught me to be nice.
> Then her lessons must have escaped you for the time it took you to post your
> thread.
> >
> > Jude
> >
> > BTW, you do not own this thread, Todd does, and he can decide who can reply.
> Where did I claim ownership of anything? Once again, point this out to me - ?>ok?
You're acting like you control who can post a reply to this thread and who
can't.
Mark - though we share an opinion about the rule, you've been a bit
unreasonable throughout this entire discussion. I hope you see that. Eric
personally attacking you may have added to the frustration, but that's
something you and him need to deal with, if this is by any chance effecting
your attitude posting here.
Take a chill pill dude, you've been a tad too demanding here.
Note, I am NOT telling you to shut up.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A letter to Todd
|
| (...) True, point taken - I was more to borrow a word "grated" that the reply had really nothing to do with the post - I know it would be impossible to keep people posting a reply to it, and posting that would only make people reply more - which it (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A letter to Todd
|
| (...) Mark Papenfuss, thats who I know I am, never claimed to be anything official, or anything more than Mark Papenfuss. Were you unclear about who I am? (...) If you have been paying attention, Todd's response rate is below 50%, he is a busy man - (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
