Subject:
|
Re: It's here!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:35:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1887 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Kevin Wilson writes:
> Jon Kozan wrote in message ...
> > Ok, what are we going to call the color?
> > Green...
> >
> > Muted Green?
> > Green-Gray?
> > Washed-Green?
> > Verdis-Green?
> > Only people with the parts in hand should actually get to vote.
>
> I was happy with verdigris before, but having seen the actual color (from
> the LOM sets) and bearing in mind the new murky blue and murky pink in the
> LOM sets, I don't think verdigris is correct any more. For one thing, this
> green is not my idea of verdigris (verdigris is quite a bright color) and
> for another there are no parallel names for the other colors. We seem to be
> happily calling the new blue color blue-grey, but I can't see calling the
> new pink, red-grey. (puke pink? :-) ) Moss green doesn't work either - the
> moss I see here in my garden is *bright* green.
>
> Muted green, grey-green, green-gray would all be OK from my point of view.
Martian Green anyone ?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: It's here!
|
| Jon Kozan wrote in message ... (...) I was happy with verdigris before, but having seen the actual color (from the LOM sets) and bearing in mind the new murky blue and murky pink in the LOM sets, I don't think verdigris is correct any more. For one (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.general)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
