Subject:
|
Re: It's here!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:35:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2131 times
|
| |
|
|
> IMHO, I think that we should use the basic color name as part of the
> descriptive, but we should come to some kind of agreement so we can get ready
> for the next new color! :-)
I agree with that.
But....
I wonder what TLG is calling it? (aside from 'new' green)
If we decide on a name & then they call it something else...
(I know I said I would let others decide, but suddenly I have nothing else
to do at work).
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: It's here!
|
| I can't remember what TLC calls gray-green but I remember I didn't like it. It was sorta Martha Stewart-ish. not descriptive. Might be helpful to look at my chart from last May: (URL) to be updated. but as you can see, (since about 4 years ago) all (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: It's here!
|
| (...) The word "green" should be in the name, I guess Antique Green would be good. (I think I might have been the one that started the thread on "Verdigris".) If people want Verdigris, then I want dark pink to be "Magenta". And that opens up (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.general)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
