LEGO SYSTEM Castle : 2713


Castle / 2713	2712 \| 2714

Subject:	Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.castle
Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:53:41 GMT
Viewed:	120 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:33:50 GMT, "Lorbaat" <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> > wrote: I'm not going to answer your whole letter, I don't participate in .auction and won't get involved too much, but let me get these straight: > After falling behind in .castle recently I started trying to catch up > (mainly to take a break from reading all this "Scott's evil! No, > Scott's misunderstood!" BS) and was disgusted to find the same sort of > bickering going on between people in there. So I'm behind again and > will probably stay that way. What bickering exactly do you mean? I don't really see what you're talking about, unless it's on the CW map, and that's been long cleared up. > To be honest, I read Lugnet from time to time at work to get AWAY from > petty bickering. Now I'm finding myself taking walks instead to get > away from the temptation to read the bickering here. I'm sorry you feel this way, it's very sad indeed if you do. I hope things won't remain like this, but some things must be decided around here, to prevent future 'bickering' and even more serious problems. Your second suggestion sounded like a good idea and I hope it gets implemented. We have to decide SOMETHING though, because these 'grey areas' are causing too much trouble where it is not wanted, it must be fixed by making some crystal clear decisions. -Shiri

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
(...) I think he's talking about the discussions on the map and stuff I was having with Craig. I must admit, at times, we didn't sound totally pleasent. :( Anyway (and Craig, I'd e-mail this to you if my server wasn't down), I've decided to wait (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.castle)

		Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
(...) I must have missed the clearing up, then. All I saw was some pretty harsh words, or maybe they seemed more harsh than they were, in light of all this other mess. Still to harsh for LUGNET, imo. (25 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
(...) I'm frankly sick of reading all this, but just because I'm not posting doesn't mean I don't have an opinion. My opinion, briefly: Scott has a history of this, but I am inclined to believe he just might have made a quick, poorly worded post (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

82 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search