Subject:
|
Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Feb 2000 17:30:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1163 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> I would guess that jury deliberations are private to protect the individual
> members, or because of the seriousness of certain crimes. Neither of these are
> applicable to a panel that discusses posting infractions on a LEGO newsgroup!
On the other hand...
I personally think the panel should present a united front. This is why I
think that the idea of appeals is not such a good one. Once something is being
talked about by "the panel", it's pretty clear the T&C have been violated. All
that needs to be worked out is whether and what disciplinary actions need to be
taken, and why/why not.
I think that can be done "behind closed doors", as long as the reasons are
explained. Perhaps if there is a dissenting opinion, it can be written up, as
in the way the Supreme Court functions.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
| (...) I agree with the concept of concensus, but there isn't always a "right" way to go about something - there will be times when someone will never feel comfortable with a certain compromise. Rather than have a panel continually reiterate their (...) (25 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
