Subject:
|
Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 00:33:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1761 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> No, it's not intended to be a private council, unless someone takes
> something off-line personally on their own accord unofficially. Anyone is
> still also welcome to participate in the discussions (offering opinions,
> raising concerns, making suggestions, etc.).
Whoops, that probably sounds contradictory. What I mean is that stuff should
IMHO be discussed openly in the .admin.council group -- there shouldn't be
any hush-hush secret stuff going on in the background. If something's being
discussed that's hush-hush, then it should IMHO be kept between private
individuals -- I probably won't even want to know about it.
As far as the difference between being "on" or not being "on" the council,
there's probably not generally a real huge difference -- except if anything
ever needed to be put to a vote (say, for example, if a consensus couldn't
be reached), in which case I suppose that the council would vote exclusively.
Of course, it's perfectly conceivable that the council might also reach the
consensus that some particular issue ought to be put to a popular vote...who
knows? Maybe even someday we'll have a council of representatives from
particular areas.
For now, you could think of the .council group as a "town square" or open
"town meeting" group with a few (maybe a dozen) "core participants" who've
agreed to generally be available to help sort out sticky problems as they
come up.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
