| |
> Scott A wrote:
> > It is apparent to me that if .council is to work (ie discuss,
> > deliberate, arbitrate, etc. on controversial issues) it is important • that
> > each council member (councillor) has the respect on the general populous
> > (remember that game?) of LUGNet. With this in mind, I hope Todd will • base
> > his choice on this. Furthermore, as LUGNet is a Global entity, I'd like • to
> > see the council reflect this. Lastly, it may be worth the bigger groups
> > within LUGNet represented directly (trains, castle, sw, ldraw, robotics,
> > loc.uk, etc). I'm sure there would be overlap between these realms if
> > individuals are chosen strategically.
> >
> > These are not demands. Just suggestions.
>
> Good point.
>
> If you infer that I was invited you would be correct...
I did not mean to infer, but I did assume it to be the case.
>
> It's not my place to reveal who else Todd invited, it's Todd's, so
> you'll have to take my word for this, but I do know who he invited, at
> least in the first round, and I would say that there is representation
> from many geographies, from many interest groups, and from many
> different viewpoints about enforcement, leniency, and so forth. Further,
> I'd posit that if the names were named, I suspect you'd agree that most
> if not all are highly regarded in the community.
You include yourself in this? :-)
I must admit, I find this whole development rather interesting. I anticipate
that, if LUGNet continues to grow, this may be part of what defines its
growth.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
82 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
