To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 4610
4609  |  4611
Subject: 
Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:23:33 GMT
Viewed: 
1221 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <38B05490.B7C062B8@voyager.net>...
Lorbaat wrote:

Here, we disagree again.  I think the T&C are perfectly valid as they • stand.  I
don't see what's "broken" about them.  What do you think is broken?  Keep • in
mind that people violating them (whether through laziness, intent, or • slip-up)
and people mistakenly accusing other people of breaking them doesn't • indicate
that they're broken.

Valid, yes in that they are internally consistent. But broken in that
they prevent things that are reasonable and necessary.


Also at least partly broken in that they rely on Todd's interpretation that
a "sealed bid auction" is not an auction (at least if it doesn't call itself
an auction).

Has anyone thought about my mind exercise of how an eBay auction is
sufficiently different from a sealed bid auction to justify being an auction
for Lugnet purposes where a sealed bid auction is a sale/trade?

I think Todd also realizes that the T&C need some work, at least a clear
definition of what an auction is. This of course based on the fact that he
started a thread to discuss that issue.


Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
 
(...) It's an or-best-offer sale. On the internet, sure, there's little difference, but it is a valid sale type. (...) Umm, because it's in no way a sealed bid auction? EBay sends you updates telling you when someone outbids you, shows you a history (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
 
(...) Valid, yes in that they are internally consistent. But broken in that they prevent things that are reasonable and necessary. (...) But I in fact said that cancellation DOES work and IS effective as a control technique. I then pointed out that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

82 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR