Subject:
|
Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:19:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1220 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> Urp. um yes... but then the proper name of this part is "Pantograph Shoe
> Holder" if one uses a trainish naming... as what it holds is pantograph shoes
>
> > From your description, you were talking about
> > <http://guide.lugnet.com/parts/search.cgi?q=2881>. Which suffers from
> > similiar name-challenges, but is a much less common part.
>
> and this part would be "Pantograph Shoe"
>
> But of course a much better name for this is something more like "rod double
> with bent ends and 2 finger clip" or something.
I forgot to mention, please take a look at these Parts Tracker entries:
<http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/2880.dat>
<http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/2881.dat>
:)
> See also the brickbay discussion groups where we are wrangling over
> nomenclature as well. There is a significant faction that does not want to
> use LDraw names because they are too confusing and too slow to get
> corrected. I would use them even if they are confusing because consistency
> is good. If Brickbay ends up with a different nomenclature (even if it's
> better) that's bad.
Do you have any links to these discussions?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
56 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
