To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1593
1592  |  1594
Subject: 
Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:10:41 GMT
Viewed: 
706 times
  
Fredrik Glöckner wrote:

This is a good and important point.  If the category
"round" is to take the same functionality as, say, the
"slope" category, it would be more correct to rename
existing parts into

    Round Plate  2 x  2
    Round Brick  2 x  2

and so on.

Good point. I support that change.

While we are discussing the subject of renaming parts,
what do you think about the suggestion posted here:

    http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=6371

It makes sense to me.

Jacob
--
<URL: småsnak://arbejde/gangmøde/...>



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) This is a good and important point. If the category "round" is to take the same functionality as, say, the "slope" category, it would be more correct to rename existing parts into Round Plate 2 x 2 Round Brick 2 x 2 and so on. After all, slope (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

56 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR