Subject:
|
Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:30:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
998 times
|
| |
|
|
"Joshua Delahunty" <dulcaoin@cse.ucsc.edu> writes:
> Personally (and I'm apparently in the minority here), I want my
> part names to work for me intuitively, and if I have to shift
> mindsets "Hmm, let's see, I think this is something they'd call
> Technic, so let me start there" rather than go with with it was
> initially (I'm speaking more of the steering link than anything
> else), it's a lot easier to remember where in the list it might be.
Admittedly, it's a bit early in the morning over here, but I can't
understand wether you mean that you want the parts to be categorized
after the the type of part, or in what kind of set it appears the
first time! *boggle*
What about the Technic Ski Pole, for example? It was originally
introduced along with the Technic figure ski element in the mid 80's
Technic arctic sets. It has a technic connector pin on one end, but
apart from that it has very few traces of technic on it. And nowadays
it is used mostly as a decorative item in Model Team sets. Should it
be in the Technic category, or should it be in the Bar category?
> It was in Blue in 1995 in a Freestyle set, at least...
It appeared that early in a Freestyle set?! Wow, at least it
demonstrates that my knowledge about Freestyle is limited.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
56 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
