To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1592
1591  |  1593
Subject: 
Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:36:52 GMT
Viewed: 
549 times
  
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk> writes:

What do we do about <part:4032> (Plate 2 x 2 Round)? Is
"plate" or "round" most important?


This is a good and important point.  If the category "round" is to
take the same functionality as, say, the "slope" category, it would be
more correct to rename existing parts into

    Round Plate  2 x  2
    Round Brick  2 x  2

and so on.


After all, slope bricks are bricks too, but they're still put into the
slope category.  Hence, it would be more consistent to do the same
with round bricks and plates.


An alternative approach would be to let the new "round" category
include _only_ "odd" parts that are not also in the brick or plate
categories.  This sounds a bit strange to me, but it would clearly
impose less changes to parts that already exist.


I would prefer the first approach, to rename _all_ rounded bricks and
plates into the new category.  But at the same time, I am a bit
unsure, as this will mean rename a bulk of parts.  So I am certainly
not sure if it is a good idea!


While we are discussing the subject of renaming parts, what do you
think about the suggestion posted here:

    http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=6371

For the benefit of off line users, let me quote:


| The name of part 2637 "Technic Link 16L" is a bit problematic, because
| it interferes with the 3711 "Technic Link Chain" and 3873 "Technic
| Link Tread".
|
| Would it make sense to rename 2637 to "Technic Rod 16L"?  That way, it
| would appear in it's own sub category, rather than sitting with the
| chain links.  At the same time, the 2739 "Technic Steering Link" could
| be renamed "Technic Rod  6L Steering", for example.


Fredrik



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) Good point. I support that change. (...) Jacob (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) I agree totally. A very important point. I'm ambivalent about the resolution. My *first* reaction is that we should leave existing parts mostly alone, unless it is very clear that they should be moved. My second reaction is that I'll go along (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
 
(...) Excellent idea. (...) Not bad. What do we do about <part:4032> (Plate 2 x 2 Round)? Is "plate" or "round" most important? I presume that we should stick to the current name and add "round" as an extra category. A similar question concerns (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

56 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR