Subject:
|
Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:39:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
901 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Robert M. Rodinsky writes:
> IMHO we should try to describe parts as genericly (sp?) as possible
> regardless of the obvious or how LEGO has used it in any particular set(s).
> There's always some imaginative builder who can use a part in a way nobody
> thought of before. Let's try not to limit that imagination.
Well put. Describe parts by their geometry and connectivity configuration,
not by the theme they came from or the type of use they were first put to.
ONLY when doing so is terribly unweildly (sp!) would I break from that. Thus:
not "rod 5l with angled plate and molded bristles"
but "minifig pushbroom"
But those are the exception.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
56 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
