 | | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) Rather than harm, I think we owe you thanks for having dug in a bit to get another perspective! Thanks! (...) I disagree here, as we have seen in some recent instances of differing versions of parts, we can argue that LDraw parts are artistic (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G55oJJ.M9@lugnet.com... (...) cost (...) is (...) The "user" base may be small, but the "viewer" base is much larger. How many times have you seen an LDraw'n model and thought, "I have got to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) Right. Now you're asking the right question. I don't know the answer. (...) True. For instance me. But if a workable royalty scheme and a searchable catalog were introduced, I think I'd be designing like mad and putting one after another up (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | MLCAD Suggestions
|
|
After several weeks of heavy MLCAD use, I offer these suggestions for future versions (or perhaps these features are available and I just haven't found them): Decimals for position: currently if a part's possition contains decimals, pressing one of (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
I hear you clearly now Larry. However, on reflection, I still think the cost of providing a ldraw import ability into CREATOR II (Son of Creator – or is that blasphemy?) will be more than the benefits it would supply to the _public_. You have to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
I will be the debian maintainer of leocad, so this issue is of interest to me. I asked a few questions about the parts library on the debian-legal mailing list. Here are the questions, answers, and my opinions about them. Please note that I mean no (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) I'm sorry, I have to agree with you that it is indeed universally applicable, and yet... not actually relevant to the real question. The real question is this: What is the expected benefit of developing and releasing a CAD program - that is in (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
It is a moot point, but I view economics as: “A means by which alternatives may be structured so that a decision may be reached.” Therefore the sunk cost rule is universally applicable. If the conclusion is that the existing CAD set-up is not (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) Right, but that's an implied understanding, not an explicit agreement. Basically, there should be a "part submission" page on ldraw.org. One of the features of that page should be a link to a full contributor's agreement. Another necessary (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) Just to raise a point, I have both, as both have their place. (...) Great list of attributes. However, they didn't hire Leonardo, for whatever reason, so we may or may not be able to count on them actually happening. (...) I've some (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) I agree. But it is a sunk cost. Do you still buy vinyl because you have a record player - or did you move to CD as it was better? (dear reader : please go to .debate to discuss vinyl v CD ) Disregarding sunk costs is a basic law of economics. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) That's information you have and we didn't... so I defer, gladly. However I do want to repeat this: (...) Well, I know what *I* prefer anyway. Open source is better than closed source, LDraw format, warts and all, is at least publicly (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) When TLG offered me a job, my first task would be to work in that project so I know what this is all about. I signed an NDA when I was in Billund and I can't talk about it but I think I can say that unless they changed their plans, they won't (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) I thought we were close to having the right mods in a previous draft. (...) In view of the implications contained in *this*: (URL) w.r.t. designing your own custom sets for TLC to manufacture for you... I think it is *extremely* important to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Screensaver anyone?
|
|
I was thinking a realtime render using OpenGL or some such. But I'd be happy with just about anything. -Peter P.S. The Unibots scored the highest average score of the state tournament this past Sunday and took second place as well as the Rookie All (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) Do you mean to do all the tiles without the top face? (that's where I would start if I was going to create a patterned part. That should be no problem. J (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org Holiday Fun
|
|
Here's an idea... Does someone want to take the standard ldraw.org header image, and give it Christmas decorations? I think that would be pretty cool, and would allow someone out there to explore what they can do with enhancing an image. I'll accept (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) Hmm. Would it be worth making subfiles for the 'blank' areas of the patterned parts? I realize these are pretty simple pieces (even with the grooves), but it would help other authors to do this. Steve (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) Sure.. I'll knock that one out tonight.. it really only takes a few minutes for each one. I'll try to hit some of the patterned 1x2s and the rest of the patterned 2x2s as well. J (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Pneumatic Pumps and Pistons
|
|
(...) Great that someone created those parts, i need the small piston for my ferry. Can you create the technic valve too? Thanks a lot Ludo (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in MLcad come not over in POVRAY
|
|
Thanks fredrik for the tip,i go make new measurements and try it but i think it works because the other guads where nice in povray.Eric (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Beretta 9mm Pistol
|
|
(...) heh.. cool... i worked on getting a functioning trigger in place last night.. i'm slowly working my way up to building an H&K MP5 (URL) i get the mechanics working using the Beretta as a test. J (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in MLcad come not over in POVRAY
|
|
If you're using L3P to convert a DAT file to POV-Ray format, the type-2 lines are simply dropped. You can try to use thin quads in stead. Fredrik (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Line in MLcad come not over in POVRAY
|
|
Hello,i have a problem,im using MLcad then L3PAO to create a pov file. But i have drawn a line in mlcad with the add line function and with the add quad function.The quad come nice over in povray using l3pao,but the line dissapear.The lines are the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) Only if you can find them. I'm not sure the POV-Ray port of L3G0 is still around... (...) OK. (...) If this separate set of files were straight POV-Ray code, they could be kept in a separate directory, and the translator/renderer could include (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Beretta 9mm Pistol [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi, I hope you don't mind,I moddifyied it to create a Star Wars blaster style gun I am atching the DAT file if anyone is interested. 0 Beretta 9mm Series 92 Pistol/Blast tech GL!% 0 Name: Blaster.dat 0 Author: ONYX (J Boen) (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: does anyone have a way to do rubber bands and belts?
|
|
Thanks for the info. I am accually ldrawing the 8480 space shuttle and that has some rubber belts in it. (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
(...) I doubt anyone would have a problem with it... -Shiri (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) Any chance of you attacking pieces like (URL), which also have the groove? Steve (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDLite status (was Re: LDLite center offset problem?)
|
|
(...) I use the ldglite as my default viewer, and as we all know it's just a thin port of the ldlite 1.6 source. I know I'm looking forward to some of these new goodies and I think there might be one or two other linux/BSD/*nix users out there who (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: does anyone have a way to do rubber bands and belts?
|
|
You can use Ldraw-mode to model any curved parts. If you use it to model the technic flexible hose (not the ribbed kind), then the "inner" cylinder used for the subpart is the correct diameter for the belts. I just created a belt to go between two (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) I still couldn't understand what do you call "contributor's license". The way I understand it is that when someone submits a part to the voting process, they are allowing it to be redistributed under the "redistribution license". I don't see (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) Looks like I've hit the quota on my web page... I trimmed a couple of files out of the .zip and got it upped. J (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) I must have been thinking of Lutz Uhlman's LGEO library. -Chuck (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) The L3GO parts could be folded in using this method. (...) In general, the POV definitions are much smaller than the DAT counterparts, so the size increase is menimal. However, perhaps a set of files that could be downloaded seperately and (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) Lutz Uhlman's LGEO library does just this with some exceptions. It is a high quality library of many of the parts from LDraw in POV-Ray. It has a slightly steeper learning curve as compared to using L3P but I would still recommend it to anyone (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | energy beast [DAT]
|
|
two main parts this is missing...the large trans-blue insectoid wings (substituted in the model)and the large insectoid leg. for completion purposes i'm using paul easter's draft of the large insectoid leg (downloadable here: (URL) FOR YOUR WORK ON (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) This is a very cool feature, for anyone 'rolling their own'. I'd definitely recommend it for including scanned/bitmap images (like printed tiles), as the POV-Ray versions will be far superior to an BMP2DAT2POV-Ray conversion. For official (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
The only problem is, this license is no use without an Authors/Contributors license to go with it. And I think this is one is *too* brief. Steve (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) file". Yep, I tried it myself from work and the .zip is bad, looks like the FTP up was bad. I'll stop by the house at lunch and re-up it. Sorry guys. J (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) I'm having this problem as well. Steve (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDLite status (was Re: LDLite center offset problem?)
|
|
I use it in conjunction with LDAO, and stand-alone sometimes. What I'd most like to see is an option to automatically scale and center the model. And, like Steve (I think) said, to crop saved images to the model boundaries to save space. Thanks, (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution comparison
|
|
WOW! Chuck (and Lars) These are great! I just rendered a test for myself( before I saw this post) and I can't get over how cool this is. Thank you, thank you, thank you! -Andy Lynch (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) Can you repost this file, or put the parts directly in this newgroup ? Thanks. Marc Klein A Mindstorms fan. (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
(...) Huh? Do you really think otherwise? (...) Really no need for it. Selçuk (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
If the resulting votes yield a close call, will we be able to request *hand recounts*? Sorry, I has to say it! :) -- ---...--- Brian J. Sayatovic mailto:trin@1.net (replace '1' with 'one') "Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Technic Pneumatic Pumps and Pistons
|
|
I have finished the modeling of the pumps and the pistons Because of the big numbers of parts, I have put them in a zip file here (URL) me if you have any problem or if I should put a mpd file directly here. I also have problems with part naming and (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Beretta 9mm Pistol with "Rack Action"
|
|
Beautiful. >:-) I gotta build this for real. I know a few people who'll get a kick out of this model. Franklin Life Member, NRA (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Beretta 9mm Pistol with "Rack Action" [DAT]
|
|
My second gen. Beretta, this time the slide can be "racked" (what you see people do in movies when they load a round from the clip into the chamber by pulling the slide back). Using a small, black rubber band (the tiny 3/8" loops) you can get the (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating folders in ML CAD
|
|
This might take till Jannuary next year, there are still some problems open which I have to fix. Michael vanda dreyfuss <cresida@nightmail.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: G4x5BF.4Gs@lugnet.com... (...) made (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution comparison
|
|
to see the difference, check this picture (URL) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
Here are the links to the parts: (URL) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | better skull [DAT]
|
|
Here is the last head to be updated with the POV primitive substutions. You need L3p v1.2 to see the improvements. check (URL) for more info 0 Minifig Skeleton Skull 0 Name: 82359.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Modified March 1999 by: Chris Dee (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part description help request
|
|
(...) For the CATEGORY, I recommentd either "Boat" or "Minifig Accessory". Depending on which CATEGORY you use, that will determine the first word of the DESCRIPTION. For KEYWORDS, I recommend the following: cannon, cannons, cannonade, "black (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | yet more better heads [DAT]
|
|
Here is the another head to be updated with the POV primitive substutions. You need L3p v1.2 to see the improvements. check (URL) for more info 0 Minifig Head with Standard Grin and Eyebrows Pattern 0 Name: 3626bp05.dat 0 Author: Chris Dee (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | even more better heads [DAT]
|
|
Here is the another head to be updated with the POV primitive substutions. You need L3p v1.2 to see the improvements. check (URL) for more info 0 Minifig Head with Standard Grin and Sunglasses Pattern 0 Name: 3626bp04.dat 0 Author: Chris Dee (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | more better heads [DAT]
|
|
Here is the another head to be updated with the POV primitive substutions. You need L3p v1.2 to see the improvements. check (URL) for more info 0 Minifig Head with Standard Grin and Pointed Moustache Pattern 0 Name: 3626bp03.dat 0 Author: Chris Dee (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | better heads [DAT]
|
|
Here is the first head to be updated with the POV primitive substutions. You need L3p v1.2 to see the improvements. check (URL) for more info 0 Minifig Head with Standard Woman Pattern 0 Name: 3626bp02.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Modified (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Better Heads [DAT]
|
|
Here is the first head to be updated with the POV primitive substutions. You need L3p v1.2 to see the improvements. check (URL) for more info 0 Minifig Head with Standard Grin Pattern 0 Name: 3626bp01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Modified (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
Awhile back, I persuaded Lars Hassing to add a feature to L3P. I wanted the ability to substutite POV language commands in the comments of a .DAT file that could be used in place of the DAT primitives when rendering through POV. This would allow (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
Terry K skrev i meddelandet ... (...) No objection. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Winner of the December 2000 ldraw MOTM is.......
|
|
Terry K skrev i meddelandet ... (...) What about dial-up connections that get a new IP number each time - how do the ISP's reuse those numbers? First caller after my logoff get's the same IP as I had? Each modem at the ISP has a dedicated IP? (I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Did anyone made this part?
|
|
I need the following part (URL) one in the first step to be able to build this boat 4010. (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 6002 halfpart FINAL version (hopefully for real this time)
|
|
Hi Mark, That looks great! Also, I'm really happy with your revised 2572. I'm building a Paradisa cathedral with the new parts. Thanks a lot! P.S. Any chance of getting the 6060.dat ( 1x6x3 & 1/3 half-arch) modified so that it matches the new 2572 (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 30295 Rock Raider Vehicle Base 18 X 12 X 1+1/3 Main part
|
|
(...) How do MPD files work exactly? Are they Ldraw compatable? The only tools I am using are Ledit and a text editor. (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
(...) (third time the charm?) No issues... I would love to see some entries from you! ++Lar (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 30295 Rock Raider Vehicle Base 18 X 12 X 1+1/3 Main part
|
|
(...) If (...) Just a minor niggle, but this and other recently posted parts might be easier to review if you included the main part and the subpart(s) in an MPD file and posted that to the newsgroup (it would also save you one posting). Chris (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 30295 Rock Raider Vehicle Base 18 X 12 X 1+1/3 Main part [DAT]
|
|
And here is the main DAT file which uses the previously posted quarter part. If anybody wants to do aditional work on this part they are welcome to it. 0 30295S4 Rock Raider Vehicle Base 18 X 12 X 1+1/3 0 By Mark Kennedy 0 1 16 0 -4 -20 0 0 60 12 0 (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 30295S4 Rock Raider Vehicle Base 18 X 12 X 1+1/3 quarter part (Needs work) [DAT]
|
|
Here is my latest part. The Rock Raider vehicle base. This is a quarter of the part used by the main DAT file. 0 30295S4 Quarter Rock Raider Vehicle Base 18 X 12 X 1+1/3 0 By Mark Kennedy 0 1 16 60 14 80 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 -60 rect.dat 1 16 88 14 140 (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part description help request
|
|
Hello everyone, I am just about finished with two new parts. The "Pirate" cannon (then non shooting one) and it's base piece. I would like some suggestions on a good part description, keywords and a category. They are available for viewing at my "in (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Fiber Optics module
|
|
Has anyone else noticed that the axle hole on this .dat file is 2 ldu higher than it should be? It would be great if someone else with this part could confirm this. -John Van (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: pneumatic cylinders (part 5108 and 5116)
|
|
(...) Any idea on an ETA? The only reason I ask is that I'm going to need several pneumatic parts in the next 10 days: the pumps, the splitter, the switch-activated valve, and the pistons. Any you think you'll have done by then will save me the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
I would trust you. Terry K <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G4yK5F.8F5@lugnet.com... (...) some (...) Or (...) (24 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM entrance question
|
|
"Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G4yK5F.8F5@lugnet.com... (...) some (...) Or (...) I wouldn't have a problem with it. -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | MOTM entrance question
|
|
Hi all, Just a quick survey of opinion. Given the fact that I oversee the voting, is there any objection to me submitting an entry in the MOTM? Am I trustworthy enough to handle it, or would it be preferable to have some oversight of the results? (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Winner of the December 2000 ldraw MOTM is.......
|
|
(...) The parallels to the US election are just *too* sweet:-) But I see that this time the Gore gone won. <g, d, r> -John (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Winner of the December 2000 ldraw MOTM is.......
|
|
Hi all, I was going to do this later, but won't have time, so mid-Saturday it is. The winner for December 2000 is "the Gorgon" by William Fitzgerald. (URL) William for a very cool model. Most all the entries did pretty well, but William had a clear (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Beretta 9mm Pistol
|
|
Looks sweet. >;-) I'll have to build it in real-life and compare it to my Beretta 92FS (actual pistol, not Lego). Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Screensaver anyone?
|
|
(...) Do you want to render new raytraced animations like running POV while the computer is not in use, or do you just want to display a raytraced animation that has been pre-rendered? Or did you want to use a real time render that uses something (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LDLite status (was Re: LDLite center offset problem?)
|
|
Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet <5e0g2tsbp71mhhjc9d6...ax.com>... (...) I have used the source (Pascal port of early version) in my LDList program, and LDLite is the default viewer for .dat-files on my computer. (...) Just scaling up/down is not (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 6002 halfpart FINAL version (hopefully for real this time) [DAT]
|
|
After much hair pulling and crying here is the completed 6002 half part. 0 part 6002 round Panel 6 x 6 x 9 with Curved Top 0 by Mark Kennedy 0 based on 2572 by unknown author 0 with bottom curved bits from 30056 by Don Heyse 0 1 16 0 212 90 -1 0 0 0 (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Beretta 9mm Pistol [DAT]
|
|
I threw this together in about 2 hours tonight. It's roughly life-sized and fits into my hand nicely. I was really surprised at how well it turned out, since I didn't hit the web for pics or anything, I just worked from memory (movies, video games (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating folders in ML CAD
|
|
Hi all! When will be the new version of ML CAD available ? Thanx! (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Screensaver anyone?
|
|
Has anyone made a rendering engine that could be set up as a screensaver for Windoze? It would be SO COOL if my FLL team could have their robot rotating around the laptop screen at tournaments... Thanks! -Peter Coach, FLL Team #1096: The Unibots (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating folders in ML CAD
|
|
(...) group, (...) Ohhhh YESSS! That would allow me to create an FLL group, with subgroups for beams, bricks, sensors, gears, etc. to duplicate the inventory boxes I made for the kids. Then MLCAD would be something my team could use, rather than me (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | License - again
|
|
Last time we talked about a license for the parts library we couldn't reach an agreement, so here I am again trying to wrap this up. I know this is a boring subject but let's try to reach an agreement. I don't think we need to write a long license, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Report Generator | Pieces
|
|
I noticed when running a piece report that it doesn't allow for pieces in sub parts. It might be nice to have an added column that shows the pieces in each sub part, then total the number of pieces in the overall model. In other words, if you have (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Creating folders in ML CAD
|
|
(...) Two thoughts on groupings: 1. For the default groupings, read the parts list and create groups for all first-words (or use the 0 CATEGORY entries from the part-files). This creates some odd non-groups, but it's better (IMO) than going through (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: numbers for "Castle" minifig torso patterns?...
|
|
(...) I'm still not sure about using 'S' for this, because S01 is commonly used for parts/s/ files. But I definitely agree with the idea. (...) Erk. Doesn't LEdit cut off file-references that a too long? (...) Authors have got to be careful to (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDLite status (was Re: LDLite center offset problem?)
|
|
(...) I use LDLite (mostly) in conjuction with LDAO (to generate the VEC images, and the HTML instruction images) and to generate the images for Partsref. Some things I'd like to see: 1. LDLite 2.0 doesn't crop saved images to the edges of the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: missing lego-cad primitive: 1-4ring9.dat
|
|
(...) This nobody won't get annoyed. :) Steve (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Unnoficial Parts (Tiles with Edge)
|
|
(...) I'm doing some checking, to try and make sure we've got the right numbers, and that we know which parts came in the older flavor. Steve (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Wizard Beard part
|
|
Anybody working on this part, or have it done?... Thanks, James Wilson (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Export Problems
|
|
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Michael Lachmann writes: <SNIP> (...) You are right, that doesn't work at all - no matter if the inputs are valid or not, both buttons do not work. Please type the paths in by hand until I release the fixed version 2.0 Thanks, (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDLite status (was Re: LDLite center offset problem?)
|
|
(...) As I have pointed out before, this is my most wanted feature upgrade of LDLITE nowadays. It looks a bit odd to see rendered images where the type 2 lines are 3 pixels wide, while the type 5 lines are plain one pixel wide. The other things you (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Need Help! Work project.
|
|
I've been given a task at work to come up with a team work learning assignment. I figured legos would be the way to go. 12 unit members each doing their part to put a whole model together. Each working on it one day. I want to make a Santa, but each (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | I am going to ldraw the technic space shuttle
|
|
I am currently in the process of ldrawing this set (8480) and I want to make sure that no one has already done it before I expend a lot of effort doing the dat. If anyone has done this model or done parts of it then please let me know. (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | description error in 2434.dat
|
|
it should read studs on sides not stud on sides (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Light trans blue in MLCAD comes out as trans dark-blue in POV-RAY
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote... (...) Erh, well, it actually does affect the POV generation ;-) /Lars (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
