Subject:
|
Re: numbers for "Castle" minifig torso patterns?...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:21:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2394 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee wrote:
> Mini-parts (*) ........ NNNSXX NNNNSXX NNNNNSXX
>
> (*) delivered from TLC on a sprue, like the helmet feathers
I'm still not sure about using 'S' for this, because S01 is commonly used
for parts/s/ files. But I definitely agree with the idea.
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> > The more I've been thinking about it, the more I'm liking what I do
> > here on my own hard drive: _extra_ sub-directories. For example:
> That's fine for users of more recent CAD tools, but would deny LDraw users
> access to the decorated parts.
Erk. Doesn't LEdit cut off file-references that a too long?
> I still see no reason why we could not use 973pa1, 973pa2, .. 973pa9, 973paa,
> .. 973paz. Subparts only need to be named to avoid conflict, so there is no
> real reason why any subparts for 973paa.dat could not be named s\973paaa.dat
> s\973paab.dat.
>
> > Thoughts?
Authors have got to be careful to clearly indicate which files go where
when they submit/post them. But that should be true anyway. :)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: numbers for "Castle" minifig torso patterns?...
|
| (...) I see three reasons why this argument may be flawed, but I think we are confusing the meaning of subpart. 1) The Pxx number are all two digits, so 973p4.dat should never exist. 2) The same pattern on a part varient would be demand a suffix for (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
