| |
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:51:41PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:34:41PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In that case, if it's true that it can't, what then?
> >
> > I'd recommend setting it up so it'll work then. I can think of a few
> > ways to do this. However, it doesn't change the point that it's up
> > to LUGNET to make sure the admins can send email to users, assuming
> > the user has actually provided a valid email address.
>
> OK. But it isn't set up NOW, is it?
>
> If so, what then?
I don't know? Be aware that your emails might not be getting where you
send them, and not fault the user for it? It's STILL not the users'
issue to solve.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) There's no faulting flowing from this direction, merely a statement that there's a problem at the user's end. (...) Sorry, why not? I'm not clear on that really. If a user has a malformed or malfunctioning mail, why isn't that the user's issue (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Hmm, I think it's actually both peoples issue to solve. SPAM is a real problem, but I have seen several providers take a lazy way out. Remember when Lugnet was incorrectly put on SPAM black lists? If it was only Lugnet's responsibility to (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
