Subject:
|
Re: Badgering emails
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:23:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3142 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 07:04:24PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> No, you're not at fault, but the issue is yours to correct. The ToU
> says you need to have a working email. That includes making sure your
> spamblock is working correctly. If your provider isn't implementing
> spamblocking correctly, you need to seek a different provider, or
> suffer the consequences of not receiving mail.
I think Kevin does have a working email? Unless you want to define
working as "has to be able to accept email from whatever domains/servers
the admins happen to use". I would define it as "able to accept email
from the LUGNET server and not spamblock @lugnet.com addresses". Which
is not the same as saying "has to accept @lugnet.com addresses from any
server".
Doesn't that make sense?
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Yes. However the LUGNET server doesn't currently have the capabilty to send (originate) mail, does it? That was how I read what you said before. In that case, if it's true that it can't, what then? (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) That's not accurate. What IS accurate is that when I discovered there was a problem, I talked to my support and based on what they told me then, I said to you that the problem was at your end. Later on, you insinuated that I was deliberately (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
