Subject:
|
Re: Badgering emails
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:47:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3927 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:42:36PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:59:45PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > > It's STILL not the users' issue to solve.
> > >
> > > Sorry, why not? I'm not clear on that really. If a user has a
> > > malformed or malfunctioning mail, why isn't that the user's issue to
> > > resolve?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Did that clear things up at all?
>
> Not really, no. I agree that's the desired end state but that's not
> what the server does now, is it? I'm asking about what should be
> done NOW.
I thought I was answering what you asked... And what hsould be done
NOW? Since you are aware of the problem, just have one of the other
admins mail Kevin if need be - since it doesn't matter which admin the
official mail comes fron...
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I'm talking about the general case. We've had several situations in the recent past when mail from admins was not received (and no bounce was returned) which led to difficulty, warnings not received, timeouts not properly started because they (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Not really, no. I agree that's the desired end state but that's not what the server does now, is it? I'm asking about what should be done NOW. (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
