Subject:
|
Re: Badgering emails
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:11:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2861 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess wrote:
>
> You know, I have to agree on this. This would be a great step forward in
> understanding whether the communication taking place is with the admin Hat on or
> the admin Hat off. It seems like such a small thing, but it would go a long way
> in clarifying how much weight to apply to the message received.
I agree. I'd give it high priority once coding resumes in a major way, but it's
not there yet.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I think this is the biggest issue here. The Admins have been trying to operate on a boat that is either malfunctioning or in the process of being fixed. There is all sorts of "you should do this or that" - they'd love to, but they can't RIGHT (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: (...) I don't understand -- how is requiring admins to use their @lugnet.com address to send official email dependent on server changes? We aren't talking about switching addresses for posting to (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) You know, I have to agree on this. This would be a great step forward in understanding whether the communication taking place is with the admin Hat on or the admin Hat off. It seems like such a small thing, but it would go a long way in (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
