Subject:
|
Re: Badgering emails
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:44:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3265 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > Have to admit, he's good at spin.
> > >
> > > I prefer to think of it as good at correcting your insinuations and false
> > > accusations.
> >
> > I'm sure you do.
>
> Whatever.
>
> But the issue remains, whose responsibility is it to ensure email communication
> works? LUGNET and the LUGNET admins? Or the user?
This is explained clearly in the ToU, and in a previous post.
>
> This issue has come up before and while the admins will do what they can, it's
> not their responsibility to fix everyone's emails.
The main admin page lists all the LTT as @lugnet.com. I've done nothing to
prevent those email addresses. If official Admin accounts are not able to send
email on a particular occasion, is that *me* not providing a functional email
address? It is not my responsibility to fix yours either.
I've prevented your *personal* emails. The ToU does *not* say that is a
violation. Also, as you are the only LTT member that I've blocked, I've still
provided access to the others, so I'm providing email access.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Whatever. But the issue remains, whose responsibility is it to ensure email communication works? LUGNET and the LUGNET admins? Or the user? This issue has come up before and while the admins will do what they can, it's not their responsibility (...) (20 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
