Subject:
|
Re: Badgering emails
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 23:06:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2301 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll raise this with the rest of the team and recuse myself.
> >
> > Finally.
>
> That's twisting stuff around, because I've recused myself in the past, and
> you're implying that I didn't.
Well to be pedantic, there were 2 statements in your sentence, Kevin's response
could have been referring to either (or both).
> The LUGNET admins do not keep a list of who has blocked whose emails, nor should
> they. That means that if someone blocks emails from an admin (justifiably or
> not) they're at risk of missing official notifications. In this case we'd
> probably remember, it's hard to forget such animus as yours, but it nevertheless
> is a risk, especially if just done quietly by the blocker.
>
> We assume that the email used to register and the email that is part of the
> posting identity (after decode) is a VALID email. If it's not valid, if it
> blocks incoming mails from admins, or if incorrectly treats mails from
> legitimate addresses as spam, that's technically a ToU violation.
Which brings up another point - do official mails come from the @lugnet.com
addresses, or from your private emails? I would suggest it would be best if it
could be arranged for them to come from a @lugnet.com address - that would make
it easier for members to make sure they aren't SPAM (or otherwise) blocked.
Don't know if it's something that's easily set up though.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) That's definitely the preferred method; in fact, I had some problems sending and receiving using my LUGNET admin email address, but those have been straightened out. While it's preferred, I don't believe that it's absolutely required, but (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) While using a "From: ...@lugnet.com" address can help with spam filter issues, I don't think it would have helped in this case, since the problem sounds like it was an actual inability of Larry's mail server to deliver mail to Kevin's. Setting (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
