| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
I think it does. If there was total trust, we wouldn’t require a policy
document.
|
And THAT’S the crux of why LUGNET is at least partly broken. The admins
don’t trust (some of) the users and (some of) the users (not necessarily
the same ones) don’t trust the admins.
|
OK let me put it another way, if it’s worth creating a P&P doc, it’s worth
assuring the users they will be listened to.
|
Yeah, I don’t believe this. The LPRV is a great example. The Admins
gathered a group of people and said, we trust you guys! We want to know what
you think! And then, seemingly out of nowhere, they started accusing the
Admins of creating a rubber stamp committee.
If you don’t trust me, then no matter HOW many times I say “I want to listen”
- you will always think I’m lying to you.. or being sarcastic or whatever.
I’ve seen it happen quite a few times.
This is an excellent example
- Scott accuses me of being insincere when I was trying to reassure. What
then?
|
Well, as long as it was Scott, it was easy enough to disregard. It was just
Scott, after all, noted button pusher.
But when we get this mistrust from people we used to respect before they wigged
out, or people we still do want to respect for their contributions, despite
their personal attacks, that’s more serious, isn’t it?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
