To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12775
12774  |  12776
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET members association
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:48:19 GMT
Viewed: 
6545 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
All member suggestions, ideas, etc. would first be reviewed by the member
association for validity or need and then proposed in a formal manner to the
administration.

I'm not sure how this would operate differently than what we have now.

LUGNET is not a democracy. A members association could be.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

So, the democratic association rules on certain tabled options and in turn
passes those options agreed upon to the aristocracy?

How is that better exactly?

-Duane



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) Possibly. (...) Because it's representative. A committee of review, appointed by an appointed committee, may, in spite of good intentions, not be representative. Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) LUGNET is not a democracy. A members association could be. Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

45 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR