To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12775
12774  |  12776
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET members association
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:48:19 GMT
Viewed: 
10548 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > > All member suggestions, ideas, etc. would first be reviewed by the member
> > > association for validity or need and then proposed in a formal manner to the
> > > administration.
> > 
> > I'm not sure how this would operate differently than what we have now.
> 
> LUGNET is not a democracy. A members association could be.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Richie Dulin

So, the democratic association rules on certain tabled options and in turn
passes those options agreed upon to the aristocracy?

How is that better exactly?

-Duane



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) Possibly. (...) Because it's representative. A committee of review, appointed by an appointed committee, may, in spite of good intentions, not be representative. Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) LUGNET is not a democracy. A members association could be. Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

45 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR