To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12799
12798  |  12800
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET members association
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 03:22:43 GMT
Viewed: 
10619 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> > > In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > > > All member suggestions, ideas, etc. would first be reviewed by the member
> > > > association for validity or need and then proposed in a formal manner to the
> > > > administration.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how this would operate differently than what we have now.
> > 
> > LUGNET is not a democracy. A members association could be.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Richie Dulin
> 
> So, the democratic association rules on certain tabled options and in turn
> passes those options agreed upon to the aristocracy?

Possibly.

> How is that better exactly?

Because it's representative.

A committee of review, appointed by an appointed committee, may, in spite of
good intentions, not be representative.

Cheers

Richie Dulin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) So, the democratic association rules on certain tabled options and in turn passes those options agreed upon to the aristocracy? How is that better exactly? -Duane (21 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

45 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR