To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12799
12798  |  12800
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET members association
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 03:22:43 GMT
Viewed: 
6824 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
All member suggestions, ideas, etc. would first be reviewed by the member
association for validity or need and then proposed in a formal manner to the
administration.

I'm not sure how this would operate differently than what we have now.

LUGNET is not a democracy. A members association could be.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

So, the democratic association rules on certain tabled options and in turn
passes those options agreed upon to the aristocracy?

Possibly.

How is that better exactly?

Because it's representative.

A committee of review, appointed by an appointed committee, may, in spite of
good intentions, not be representative.

Cheers

Richie Dulin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) So, the democratic association rules on certain tabled options and in turn passes those options agreed upon to the aristocracy? How is that better exactly? -Duane (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

45 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR