|
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur wrote:
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
|
I think it does. If there was total trust, we wouldnt require a policy
document.
|
And THATS the crux of why LUGNET is at least partly broken. The admins
dont trust (some of) the users and (some of) the users (not necessarily
the same ones) dont trust the admins.
|
OK let me put it another way, if its worth creating a P&P doc, its worth
assuring the users they will be listened to.
|
Yeah, I dont believe this. The LPRV is a great example. The Admins
gathered a group of people and said, we trust you guys! We want to know
what you think! And then, seemingly out of nowhere, they started accusing
the Admins of creating a rubber stamp committee.
If you dont trust me, then no matter HOW many times I say I want to
listen - you will always think Im lying to you.. or being sarcastic or
whatever. Ive seen it happen quite a few times.
This is an excellent
example - Scott accuses me of being insincere when I was trying to
reassure. What then?
|
Well, as long as it was Scott, it was easy enough to disregard. It was just
Scott, after all, noted button pusher.
But when we get this mistrust from people we used to respect before they
wigged out, or people we still do want to respect for their contributions,
despite their personal attacks, thats more serious, isnt it?
|
Larry,
No. Id start to worry when (arguably justified) personal attacks on a LUGNET
admin are spotlighted on
LUGNETs homepage. For that to happen once is very unfortunate. For it to
happen repeatedly
Id be further concerned when mistrust in adimns dominates the
newsgroups or when admins
start attacking people publicly (and attack others with
abusive e-mails). But Id be
most worried when a proven lying trouble making plagiariser whom a lot of
people think unsuitable is
made an admin.
|
My miscounting was wrong, and I was wrong to say Larry did any abusive emailing.
I respectfully request that http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=12791 post
be cancelled, so that Larry no longer has to defend himself against false
charges.
|
Be a man. Give us a break. Go away and get a life.
Scott A
PS
but all that is my button pushing opinion! ;)
PPS Are you the kind of Admin LUGNET needs?
|
Not in my opinion.
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|