 | | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) I'd prefer a landscape version -- that's the orientation of my monitor. Circular is just ridiculous -- thanks for not picking that. (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Searching the Newsgroups from the Web interface
|
|
Todd, Is there any way to search the newsgroups using the dialog box at the top of each page, but sort the results by DATE? I can't tell how it is weighting the results, but I get a few from a couple of days ago, then one from 10 months ago, and (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Problem
|
|
(...) Third try worked. But the first two have vanished into thin air. (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Posting Problem
|
|
I have attemopting to send a new mesage to lugnet.general twice in the last 2 days. After I click the Post Message button, I do not get a "your message has been accepted" message and (it returns to the message list) the post goes nowhere. (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) And has been pointed out before, S@H has been part of LD (actually in full it's LDMI - LEGO Direct Marketting Inc) for longer than LD has been being talked about here - look at some of your old S@H receipts, I have one from 4/13/99 which says (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) Orgchartwise, S@H reports to LD. So no. S@H *is* LD. Not all of it, natch, but part of it. QED, like I said. :-) ++Lar (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) I think that Todd's saying that Lego Direct is a completely different entity from Shop At Home. LD relates to the consumers; S@H sells stuff. (26 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | parts tracker, where did it go?
|
|
this link seems to be broken: (URL) shown on the lugnet.cad.parts page: (URL) ) Didn't the parts tracker move to here: (URL) one is what the ldraw.org site links to. I wanted to see if some parts were being worked. ++Lar (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) Great, thanks! BTW, just to be picky, LD does indeed sell bulk elements. it says so right on the bulk page that they are fulfilled via S@H, which as we know, is a part of LD. QED, LD sells bulk elements. :-) ABTW, what happens wednesday? You (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | URL update?
|
|
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this or not, but the lugnet.rcx.legos newsgroup has been getting several mails because the link on the "front page" for that group ((URL) to the legOS HOWTO is badly broken, and has been for several (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) Hmm, good question. I'll know more after Wednesday, but I think it'll need to be a new category or something like /lego/bulk/. For now, I put a link to it from the /lego/ area (just a link) and from the /lego/direct/ area (here, a link with an (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) OK. Where DOES it belong, then? Somewhere obvious, please. <sigh> ++Lar (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) LEGO Direct doesn't sell bulk elements. --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quick idea....
|
|
(...) I believe it's already been implemented. I think lugnet.loc.uk has an editor, for example. What hasn't been implemented (I don't think) is the direct ability to allow multiple people to edit the same page (although you can fudge it by (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) Yep, that's it, thanks! Belongs on the Lugnet(tm) LEGO Direct page IMHO. ++Lar (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Quick idea....
|
|
Hey guys, Just thought of something. It may or may not have been thought of before. What about having 'community editors' for the links on the sides of the web interface pages?? This way, people whose active interest is in a specific group can log (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) Do you mean (URL) ? HTH. -Adam (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Link to Lego Direct
|
|
ought to be on the (URL) page. Or somewhere. Right now I need it for something and can't find it. Searching with obvious keywords is turning up too many hits. ++Lar (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | lugnet.org.it ?
|
|
Hi Todd, from a discussion in our lugnet.loc.it newsgroup we have recently pointed out a need for a lugnet.org.it group, to discuss about important plannings, events, features of the ItLUG user group. Is the creation of such a newsgroup possible? (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I bought a CX and a DA (I'll have to check, I think they both have the D pattern on the front). As far as quality goes... the Beefy T feels a little thinner than I recall them being. The artwork looks like some type of iron-on process, not (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) First of all, I like the concept of the shirts. I used to wear my Green Day shirt everywhere back when they were nobodys, and then if someone recognized it, they knew that both of you had that rare thing in common. Lugnet shirts offer the same (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Do the higher prices of the "art" designs seem offensive in any way, or just strange? Do they discourage purchasing of the lower-priced "standard" designs? How do people feel about the prices as a whole? Basically none of the shirts are (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) Hey, I'm using my landscape mousepad in a portrait configuration right now ;-). Why? Not enough space on my desk! Maybe I'll have to order one of these revolutionary mousepads!. FUT lugnet.off-topic.fun Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) Mostly for design/layout reasons in two of the three cases, but also because I've never understood why landscape mousepads even exist in the first place, not having ever met anyone who's had the horizontal room on their desk to use the pad in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
Yeah but you try finding what you want, from the viewpoint of someone who hasn't been here for very long and doesn't know how versatile Lugnet is, if only one could find what one wants in it ... Piece references seem to turn up in a lot of places (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a my.netscape-style RDF for portals?
|
|
(...) I must chime in here... 'though it cert'nly isn't going to be at the top of his priorities now, I suppose. (uh-oh... Jeremy, you're steeling my a's 'gain, huh? ;-) <snip> That would be great... whoa. That would be just *fabulous*. I can't wait (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a my.netscape-style RDF for portals?
|
|
(...) (even though I know Todd is a particularly busy person, and has many other probably more important hot-item issues to work on...) Me too! I'm getting more and more excited about the potential for a portalized LUGNET, since we're starting work (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) True - but that would take a lot of combined effort. The question is, do we need a temporary solution *until* there's a permanent, searchable db? (...) Uh, probably he has other things on his mind right now, see (URL) (...) Yeah - they don't (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) You didn't mention FUT, so I'm ignoring this bit. (...) I'd rather not see db.inv's charter changed. I think a new group would be better. Actually, the true, proper solution is a queryable database. Maybe that's why Todd Lehman is staying out (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Geoffrey Hyde wrote: (about the various groups under discussion) (...) The thing is, all the groups (.cad.dat.parts, .db.brictionary, .db.inv, and .db.scans) are very clear-cut in their purposes, and none of them are in (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | How about a my.netscape-style RDF for portals?
|
|
It would be neat if you served up the same kind of first-few-post views from each LUGNET group as an RDF so that they could be added as channels. (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3t6mms4nv2q1fgv...4ax.com... (...) They'd probably be covered with the one cent GST adds to that because of rounding up to the nearest cent. :) (...) spell*) (...) was (...) Perhaps, but (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Cancelling Posts?
|
|
Quoting a post posted six months ago .... Has a facility for cancelling posts via the web interface been implemented? I wrote in this post that I go fire up a newsreader when I want to cancel a post, but my NNTP access has become so dicey that I no (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) Either would be good. I could come up with advantages of either way. I have a preference for appending the .marketplace groups to the theme hierarchies for ease of reading via the web interface. On the other hand, placing them all within a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I (...) after (...) P. (...) both (...) who (...) I remember that. There was a lot of discussion about it. (...) The (...) calls (...) always (...) website (...) All right. My memories of this are rather foggy, I guess. This sounds like a good (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I don't remember flatly rejecting it, but I remember a lot of opinions on both sides of the issue -- people who think it would be a good idea and people who think it would be a bad idea. More likely (and I lean toward thinking perhaps it's (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I think market.theme was preffered over theme.market, but none were seen as being better than the existing setup. As user numbers increase I expect things will change... but who knows when the numbers will begin to justify that? I suppose (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I thought we took this already to a conclusion a few months ago. AFAIR, I think Todd flatly rejected it. I think it is a good idea, but it is me after all, and I am weird. I'll let the all-mighty Todd craft the ever elegant answer to your (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
Hi ... I'm a compartmentalized dork ... :^) I'd be surprised if this hasn't been suggested, but why not have a lugnet.castle.marketplace, a lugnet.space.marketplace, lugnet.starwars.marketplace, etc? This is a subtly different idea than having a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
Uh... duh. I said XP, but didn't. :-) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
XP .db.inv (...) <snip> I agree. Hmmm... I'm thinking something along the lines of slightly changing the charter for .db.inv (or alternatively, creating a new group). If the charter was changed from... (...) to, for example... : lugnet.db.inv: : (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) And what about the import tariffs? (...) Let's see... You posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.db.inv, and lugnet.db.scans. The charters for these groups are (actually, were, since I just jumped back to message: (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fa New Lego Parts - Many Yellow Slopes
|
|
(...) You are correct - I just zapped it. It was a complete mistake, my previous post was an auction post posted from .technic, but to .auction. I must have forgot I was still logged on to that group. Sorry Scott A (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fa New Lego Parts - Many Yellow Slopes
|
|
(...) I don't think this should go in lugnet.technic. Fredrik (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
And here in Aussie, we'd probably get 10% added onto that for GST because it's a 'service'. :) I think I should officially ask Todd Lehman (*invokes 'summon god' spell*) so that we may *all* have somewhere to post parts queries. How far off was I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Hope so. :( That's the only way, short of me losing about 100 pounds (I'm not letting that be a goal for me even though I'd like to do it one day), I'll ever be able to wear a LUGNET T-shirt. (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) Heh. Yeah. Cross-posted to 4 groups because there isn't one group for it. Parts questions constantly pop up and they aren't likely to dry out at anytime. Just my 2 cents... (money's overrated anyway ;-) -Shiri (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) Yes we do, as shown by post (URL). Steve (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) Hmm... sounds like the "we need a .parts group" again ;-) Of course that wouldn't be a good name... but still. Todd? XFUT .admin.general -Shiri -- I'll be on vacation between July 15th and the end of August... please forgive slow replies to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Agreed. I've got way too many white t-shirts -- most of the vendor t-shirts I get, for example. I hate to *pay* for a white one. (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
The E mousepad design would make a KILLER black shirt, especially if the background covered as much of the shirt as possible (NOT possible for Cafepress, I realize, but you may need to find another company in order to have > XL shirts anyways). (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
Actually, ANY of the designs on a black T would look much better to me - white shirts get permanently stained too quickly. I do realize that black Ts cost more, as they have to be double-printed for light colors to show up correctly, but I'd pay (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Preview: LUGNET T-Shirts, Mousepads, Coffee Mugs
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tom Stangl writes: Hey guys, keep these posts coming, it makes me feel lean. :) Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Indeed. I have a very nice polo shirt from AEI (The Engineering firm I work for) from Lands End. That might be a good avenue to approach for shirts Todd. I love my Black AEI shirt. : ) (3X, no less! : ) ) Scott S. -- (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
I was thinking with the design stitched rather than printed on the Polo shirts. I've got a polo shirt with a red miata on it that was done really well. I would think the lugnet logo should stitch up fine as well. david (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: possible error on Members by Country page?
|
|
(...) Here's a flag that fits your size: (URL) . Here is a real flag: (URL) . Alan (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
Hear, Hear!!! I third that motion! Polo shirts would be fantastic. Does iPrint do shirt transfers?? But I ordered a DX in Size XL so I would have one, and I'm invoice 10000...but I'm not sure that that's 10000 for LUGNET alone :-) Paul Sinasohn (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I like 'F' the best. I guess I'm just into 'simple'. H is nice too, but not as clean as F. And J, though nice, totally obscures the logo and just looks a tad random for my tastes. This is all, clearly, IMHO. And I'm probably not really (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: possible error on Members by Country page?
|
|
(...) Ah yes -- thanks -- the "MY" country code stands for Malaysia, which is given in the list of countries on the sign-up form but doesn't have a web category yet...I'll fix that...not sure about a flag yet. Thanks for reporting this. --Todd (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) Here's the L coffee mug design: (URL) the rest: (2 URLs) the mousepads: (2 URLs) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Oooooh - agreed!! Definitely... -Shiri (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) think I still prefer the three variations here: (URL) T-shirts with the back-litlogo would look pretty cool :) --Bram (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | possible error on Members by Country page?
|
|
Hi Todd, I was just perusing the Members by country page that you put up a while back: (URL) I got down to the entry for KK Quah, the little icon to the left which is a flag is missing ( or seems to be ), and when I click on the link, it tries to (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Ya, that too -- especially with the difference between the GX and AJ designs. It's hard to tell from the thumbnails on the J design but it's pretty trippy. At full size 8" x 8" it's easier to get the whole effect. There's also an L design (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) The goal with the pricing is to roughly maximize the total number of sales on the "standard" (e.g., mainly logo-based) shirts and to roughly maximize the total amount of monetary intake on the "art" (e.g., trippy hexagonal pattern grid) (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I suppose, although Todd would be the only one to actually say <grin>, that it depends on the amount you want to "donate" to lugnet; that gives people a chance to decide for themselves. Just like the membership - you pay what you feel is (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) it's a bit too obsecure) yet the motif of the reoccuring <sp> triangles is also visible. Nice job! -Shiri (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) OK. (...) Glad to hear it! I still like it too! What do you think of the "art" style designs based on it? (3 URLs) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Just out of curiosity, the base price of the shirts appears to be $11.00 irregardless of the design. Why the difference in how much LUGNET receives by the design of the shirt? Why not just make them all $15.00 and make $4.00 on each shirt? (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Just out of curiosity, the base price of the shirts appears to be $11.00 irregardless of the design. Why the difference in how much LUGNET receives by the design of the shirt? Why not just make them all $15.00 and make $4.00 on each shirt? (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Hmm -- tough (and great) questions! Well, hmm, the XL size says Adult XL (46/48)/XG/TG on the label if that helps... Alternatively, measuring an XL flat gives a width of 25 in. (~63.5 cm.) and a height (measuring from the tippy top of the neck (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I think it would help if the sizes were given in inches / cm's to. The S/M/X/XL system varies so much within the UK, and I assume will do to a greater extent internationally. Further is a UK XL person the same as a XL type in the US? Also, I (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Agreed, 2XL is a must for this consumer too... unless they run really really huge which I don't think Hanes BeefyT's do (although they are, as they say, nice an beefy, made of thick cotton material that's pretty opaque, a good quality shirt) (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Well at $20, shipping to Scotland is only and extra $1. Even so $20 seams quite high - it costs $30 to ship a RDS to the UK via airmail. Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) From a UK perspective, these prices are pretty fair - for a plain white t-shirt/vest I pay about $15. This is for a good quality item, I'm sure I could pay less than half that if I looked hard enough. Equally, I'm sure I could pay double (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
Todd, (...) Cool! Too bad I can't fit in XL. : ( Good luck! Scott "Can't get a LUGNET shirt and wants to cry in my beer if I drank beer" S. -- Want LEGO Elements at Great Prices? Visit The Sanburn Systems Company www.sanburnsystems.com Scott E. (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why do my posting privileges come un-stuck?
|
|
(...) Oops. I get the least trouble while using Communicator 4.6 at home, not 4.0.8. I've started sniffing my own packets for understanding. Amazing what goes on on a network. (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I don't understand the difference in prices from shirt to shirt. I also don't know why someone would want to be charged more. When I want to donate to LUGNET, I'll just Paypal you or send a check. As far as I can see it, they ought to all be (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
Todd, I'd really like to see a shirt that has the C or D pattern on the front, but nothing on the back. I think that would be discrete enough for me to include in my standard casual office-wear wardrobe. The current CA or DX could work, but it (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Prototype friendlier LUGNET homepage (was: Re: A requested improvement for LUGNET)
|
|
(...) admin.general more often). I like the new design, but I think there's still a lot of information to digest on the front page. Maybe it's just me, but I don't like the trend toward busier and busier front pages on many web sites. The prototype (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Wouldn't be a problem if CafePress did XXL t-shirts :-) Richard (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) $13 is good for the DX :) But I probably wouldn't blink if it was $15. You seem to have priced the ones with the bigger logo's and most colour higher than the rest? Maybe it's just my Britishness, but I'd feel a bit too gaudy wearing a t-shirt (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I like the designs, but what about sizes bigger than XL? How about Polo shirts with the C or D design on them? I could get away with wearing a Polo in the office. David (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Welp, maybe things are priced wrong. That can be pretty easily adjusted. what do you (or anyone) think are good prices for these? --Todd (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) US, and I do not own a house to mortgage to pay the exchange on that :-) Jude Perhaps I'll wait until I am going to be in the US sometime and get the t- shirt then. (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Yeah, I was about to send an order to Toronto, but I don't want to be hit for that much shipping :) Richard PS. DX was my favourite design too, but it's a shame that that gives the *least* to LUGNET. If I had the choice, I'd probably buy a CX, (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) The way it is simply now avoids trademark and disclaimer issues -- if it included "LEGO" it would likely need a 40-word disclaimer and trademark acknowledgement. --Todd (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I don't know -- I'm not the one shipping the stuff. CafePress.com handles it all and sets the rates. It sounds plausible, though. Probably your best bet is to find a friend in the U.S. who could buy one and resell it to you at cost plus (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Preview: LUGNET T-Shirts, Mousepads, Coffee Mugs
|
|
(...) ROFL. That'd show real dedication :) --Bram (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Todd, Am I to understand that the $13.00 DX shirt will cost me $33.00 because it is being shipped internationally?!? (All the way to Ottawa, Canada) Please say it ain't so. Jude (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) stands for, though. Maybe you should offer a version that says LEGO Users Group Network underneath a larger LUGNET? (BTW, I like the designs of the two cheapest shirts best :) --Bram (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
Here they are! (URL) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.loc.uk NEEDS YOU! Maintainering volunteers?
|
|
I'm crossposting this to admin.general, with followups set back to loc.uk, as I'm not sure exactly how getting you your editing cookie will work. That is, I know that there were plans to tie editing cookies into the membership login cookie, but I (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why do my posting privileges come un-stuck?
|
|
(...) Me too and I wish I knew why. I think it's just bugginess in Netscape cookie handling. Or the cookie monster. It seems to happen to me to Lugnet more often than elsewhere (like on Yahoo finance) but I'm *on* Lugnet more. Just as Shiri did, I (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why do my posting privileges come un-stuck?
|
|
Hey Erik, Can't help you, but you might wanna XP this to .admin.general... (where it'll more likely catch Todd's attn) In fact, don't bother, I did it for you :-) -Shiri P.S. Todd - if we have .admin.nntp... should there be a .admin.web-interface? (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: adding brickbay
|
|
(...) :-) Thanks! Julie (26 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: adding brickbay
|
|
(...) Not yet... but he will be. ;) James (26 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is the Age Limitations thread a record holder?
|
|
(...) If there are/were, I can't think of any. Of course there have been much bigger ones overall, but it seems to me that this one has grown to a large size the most rapidly. ATM the thread is averaging one post every 7.5 minutes. --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
