Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:52:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
137 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > Todd,
> >
> > > Here they are!
> > >
> > > http://www.lugnet.com/gear/tshirts/
> > >
> > > --Todd
> >
> > Cool! Too bad I can't fit in XL. : ( Good luck!
> >
> > Scott "Can't get a LUGNET shirt and wants to cry in my beer if I drank beer"
>
> Agreed, 2XL is a must for this consumer too... unless they run really really
> huge which I don't think Hanes BeefyT's do (although they are, as they say,
> nice an beefy, made of thick cotton material that's pretty opaque, a good
> quality shirt)
I think it would help if the sizes were given in inches / cm's to. The S/M/X/XL
system varies so much within the UK, and I assume will do to a greater extent
internationally. Further is a UK XL person the same as a XL type in the US?
Also, I assume the S/M/X/XL refers to a male build?
Scott A
>
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
| (...) Hmm -- tough (and great) questions! Well, hmm, the XL size says Adult XL (46/48)/XG/TG on the label if that helps... Alternatively, measuring an XL flat gives a width of 25 in. (~63.5 cm.) and a height (measuring from the tippy top of the neck (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
| (...) Agreed, 2XL is a must for this consumer too... unless they run really really huge which I don't think Hanes BeefyT's do (although they are, as they say, nice an beefy, made of thick cotton material that's pretty opaque, a good quality shirt) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
