Subject:
|
Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:41:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
306 times
|
| |
|
|
Yeah but you try finding what you want, from the viewpoint of someone who
hasn't been here for very long and doesn't know how versatile Lugnet is, if
only one could find what one wants in it ... Piece references seem to turn
up in a lot of places ...
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:521pms8gdmid11962oboitquifph78qmnm@4ax.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
>
> (about the various groups under discussion)
>
> > Maybe. But who else would have seen these specific pieces I'm after? • And
> > the purpose of enquiring is to find out if you're in the right place for
> > that enquiry anyway, if you don't ask you'll never know.
>
> The thing is, all the groups (.cad.dat.parts, .db.brictionary, .db.inv, • and
> .db.scans) are very clear-cut in their purposes, and none of them are in
> place to field queries about parts-and-sets.
>
> Not to fault you -- there has been something of a need for a lugnet.parts
> newsgroup for some time. There is no good place to post these questions
> right now.
>
> > Probably, but I thought about posting here, and .general, but thought it • was
> > *too* general - may have been lost in the discussion threads anyway, also
> > lately .admin.general is getting low on traffic ...
>
> Nah, this isn't a question for .admin.general -- unless you wanted to ask,
> "where should I post this question?"
>
> And .general gets a lot of traffic because a lot of people read it, and
> respond to questions.
>
> Another place you could've gone is lugnet.town. The parts you're looking
> for are all Townish pieces, and no one can accuse lugnet.town of getting
> too much traffic.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Geoffrey Hyde wrote: (about the various groups under discussion) (...) The thing is, all the groups (.cad.dat.parts, .db.brictionary, .db.inv, and .db.scans) are very clear-cut in their purposes, and none of them are in (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
