To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7123
7122  |  7124
Subject: 
Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:37:15 GMT
Viewed: 
4186 times
  
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > > Any thoughts?  (Has this already been suggested and rejected?)
> > 
> > I thought we took this already to a conclusion a few months ago. AFAIR, • I
> > think Todd flatly rejected it. I think it is a good idea, but it is me • after
> > all, and I am weird. I'll let the all-mighty Todd craft the ever elegant
> > answer to your question. Not to be confused with the all-powerful Larry • P.
> 
> I don't remember flatly rejecting it, but I remember a lot of opinions on • both
> sides of the issue -- people who think it would be a good idea and people • who
> think it would be a bad idea.

I remember that. There was a lot of discussion about it.

> More likely (and I lean toward thinking perhaps
> it's inevitable someday) is creating subgroups of the .market groups
> for specific themes rather than creating .market subgroups of each theme. • The
> sub-group nomenclature of all the theme/system groups (lugnet.castle,
> lugnet.town, lugnet.space, etc.) is reserved for "sub-themes" (or as LEGO • calls
> them, the "play themes" within the systems), for example Forestmen within
> Castle, Arctic within Town, Blacktron within Space, etc.  There could • always
> be cross-ref links from the /castle/, /town/, and /space/ areas on the • website
> to the corresponding market areas.

All right. My memories of this are rather foggy, I guess. This sounds like a
good avenue to balance market within the themes.

Scott S.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
 
(...) I don't remember flatly rejecting it, but I remember a lot of opinions on both sides of the issue -- people who think it would be a good idea and people who think it would be a bad idea. More likely (and I lean toward thinking perhaps it's (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

10 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR