Subject:
|
Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:17:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
787 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > Any thoughts? (Has this already been suggested and rejected?)
>
> I thought we took this already to a conclusion a few months ago. AFAIR, I
> think Todd flatly rejected it. I think it is a good idea, but it is me after
> all, and I am weird. I'll let the all-mighty Todd craft the ever elegant
> answer to your question. Not to be confused with the all-powerful Larry P.
I don't remember flatly rejecting it, but I remember a lot of opinions on both
sides of the issue -- people who think it would be a good idea and people who
think it would be a bad idea. More likely (and I lean toward thinking perhaps
it's inevitable someday) is creating subgroups of the .market groups
for specific themes rather than creating .market subgroups of each theme. The
sub-group nomenclature of all the theme/system groups (lugnet.castle,
lugnet.town, lugnet.space, etc.) is reserved for "sub-themes" (or as LEGO calls
them, the "play themes" within the systems), for example Forestmen within
Castle, Arctic within Town, Blacktron within Space, etc. There could always
be cross-ref links from the /castle/, /town/, and /space/ areas on the website
to the corresponding market areas.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
| (...) I (...) after (...) P. (...) both (...) who (...) I remember that. There was a lot of discussion about it. (...) The (...) calls (...) always (...) website (...) All right. My memories of this are rather foggy, I guess. This sounds like a good (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
| (...) Either would be good. I could come up with advantages of either way. I have a preference for appending the .marketplace groups to the theme hierarchies for ease of reading via the web interface. On the other hand, placing them all within a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
| (...) I thought we took this already to a conclusion a few months ago. AFAIR, I think Todd flatly rejected it. I think it is a good idea, but it is me after all, and I am weird. I'll let the all-mighty Todd craft the ever elegant answer to your (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
