Subject:
|
Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 03:01:19 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm+AntiSpam+.org
|
Viewed:
|
982 times
|
| |
|
|
Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
> What do you *mean* there is no "lugnet.dork.compartmentalized"?!?
Sure there is:
lugnet.people.traits.psychology.neuroses.obsessive.compulsive.nntp.posting.
groupchoice.discrete
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
| (...) Funny I never noticed that before!! I'd think that with the amount of compartmentalized dorks we have around here, the traffic would be amazingly high... maybe it's blocked on my skip-filter settings somehow... lemme check... ;-) -Shiri "Hi, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
