To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 1920
1919  |  1921
Subject: 
Re: 'Will ship to United States only - Oi!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shipping, lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.market.shipping
Date: 
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:29:50 GMT
Viewed: 
3052 times
  
[FUT: lugnet.market.shipping]


In lugnet.market.theory, Geoffrey Hyde writes:

"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatico.deletethisspamblock.ca> wrote in

As far as I'm concerned people are free to choose where they will
ship to.  But here's how my shipping methods work in Canada.  Order
comes in, I measure up the sets stacked in the smallest volume
possible.  I have learned that *all* LEGO sets will have shipping
charged by volume and not weight because their density is so low.  The
"minimum density" that gets applied is an internation standard
so most all countries will calculate the effective weight the same
way.  I calculate this weight in all of 15 seconds..., no scale

Is that only for LEGO packed in the original boxes?  I've got a fair bit of
LEGO I'm sorting out and it weighs around 10kg, and it's in a box around
about 40cm by 30cm by 25cm but it's not MISB in original boxes - it's all
bagged, ready for me to send it wherever I want to send it.  When I had the
weight checked, Australia Post here never mentioned anything about volume
charges ...


Yeah, sorry, it is for sets in the original boxes.  There's a lot of
air inside LEGO sets.  When you load a plane, truck, etc., you are
space-limited.  That air you're shipping takes up the space of a lot
of other packages.  So they make the air really heavy and charge you
accordingly by weight  :]  The int'l standard I referred to says you
take the volume (in cm^3) and divide by 6000 to get kg.  (Somebody
can work out the number for other length units, I've got to go get
ready for work.)  Every set I've shipped has had this "fake weight"
higher than actual, and that's what determines the shipping.  The
closest one I've had to going buy its actual weight was I think
the 4561 train set.  It's heavy and packed pretty tight.

Anyhow, you can now see that adding packing material around the set
will increase shipping costs dramatically, because the volume shoots
way up.  As a result I make custom boxes (cardboard "shells") to
put around the sets for protection.  It seems to work as long as no
one sits on the package  :]

Gotta go,
KDJ

_______________________________________
LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 'Will ship to United States only - Oi!
 
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:G7wG0z.E4t@lugnet.com... (...) costs, (...) why (...) the (...) Is that only for LEGO packed in the original boxes? I've got a fair bit of LEGO I'm sorting out and it weighs (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shipping, lugnet.general)

42 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR