Subject:
|
Re: IBLTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:43:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
523 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains.org, Eric Kingsley writes:
> So I hope I didn't misunderstand the purpose of IOLTC. I assume that it is
> just going to be a place where groups can share experiances and ideas without
> the worry about "Big Brother" looking over their shoulders.
Well, in sub-threads like this one:
http://news.lugnet.com/trains/org/?n=1189
it seems a lot like IOLTC, IBLTC, or ICLTC (whatever it ends up getting called)
is going to be expected to "negotiate" with TLC, etc on behalf of its
sub-groups.
If that is going to be the case, NELUG should seriously discuss whether or not
we want to join in such an endeavor.
As I said, I have nothing against sharing info with other groups- in fact, I
would love an environment that encouraged that kind of information sharing.
But I wouldn't want to see NELUG tied to other groups more formally.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) I would agree. I things are still in the planning stage so I want to wait it out but I don't think this new organization should or could negotiate flat deal that would satisfy all regional organizaions. I personally only want to do this for (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) It is to me. I guess I don't expect IOLTC to "represent" NELUG in any formal sense. What I expect IOLTC to be is a forum where we can share experiances, including honorarium fee's from show promoters as well as any "considerations" they have (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
