Subject:
|
Re: IBLTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:12:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
414 times
|
| |
|
|
I dont think the need for the IOLTC would be dealing with LEGO as a group,
but more for dealing with show promoters as a group. I think once shows
catch on that we are talking with each other and such, then we're in a
better position to negotiate better fees for displaying at such shows.
Now don't get me wrong, I don't do the shows for the money. But I'm getting
say $200 for a GATS show and I learn that other clubs are getting say $250.
Then I'm going to start asking for $250. It's been hard to judge what to ask
for in the past since the whole LTCs at shows is fairly new ground (I know
the GMLTC has been around for a while, but not as an LTC).
So I think that is more the reason for the forming of the IOLTC, to unify
the train clubs. I think it's about sharing ideas and experiences, helping
each other from things we've learned at the shows.
jt
In lugnet.trains.org, John Gerlach writes:
> In lugnet.trains.org, Kevin Wilson writes:
> > Can this include clubs which don't call themselves LTC's but exhibit layouts
> > at train shows, like VLC?
> >
> > Kevin
>
> That is a question that I've been wrestling with. Someone farther up the
> thread put forth the idea that the IOLTC would be used for contacts and
> negotiations with LEGO and LEGO Direct.
>
> What sort of negotiations? What would any potential IOLTC member group
> expect to get from LEGO? Free stuff? Discounted stuff? Advice or assistance?
>
> All of these things have value. So my question becomes "what are you doing
> for LEGO, if you expect LEGO to do something for you?"
>
> Every time a group displays a layout at a show, they are providing wonderful
> exposure and promotion for LEGO trains. Should that merit some special
> considerations from LEGO? Maybe, maybe not - you could argue either side.
> If a group of train fanatics get together and call themselves an "LTC",
> should they merit the same considerations?
>
> Please take my comments with the necessary grain of salt. I'm a member of
> the GMLTC. We've done many shows, and we've talked to thousands of people
> about LEGO trains. And yes, we've gotten some stuff from LEGO - like a
> mostly expenses paid trip to Carlsbad last Summer! But in my mind, I think
> we've earned some of that through our thousands and thousands of hours of
> work on our layouts, and for our time and expenses when we do shows.
>
> Would I like to see LEGO encourage more LTCs to form? Absolutely! The more
> groups that are out there, the better the environment will be for all of us.
> Would I like to see LEGO support new groups as they prepare for their first
> show? Absolutely! Would I like to see LEGO support a group of trainiacs
> who have no plans to show? I can't say that I would...
>
> Yea, I'll probably be flamed for this, and I accept that. I just wanted to
> bring up the question of what IOLTC member groups would expect from LEGO...
>
> JohnG, GMLTC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) That is a question that I've been wrestling with. Someone farther up the thread put forth the idea that the IOLTC would be used for contacts and negotiations with LEGO and LEGO Direct. What sort of negotiations? What would any potential IOLTC (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
