Subject:
|
Re: IBLTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:48:59 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest.^nomorespam^net
|
Viewed:
|
560 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.trains.org, James Powell writes:
> > In lugnet.trains.org, Steven Barile writes:
> > > Great, Fire it up! First one done wins! I have no preferences.
> >
> > I think I would perfer IBLTC, because the train unions are typically
> > "International Brotherhood of...". I know that the Live Steamers use
> > IBLS (International Brotherhood of Live Steamers). It functions as a
> > volentary overview of the hobby, with a east coast and a west coast rep.
> > (No, I am not a member, somewhat supprisingly...)
>
> Wow, that's kind of surprising to hear. I've been meaning to ask, as this
> thread has unfolded... Are women allowed in LEGO train clubs, or is it a
> boys-only thing?
Yeah, I agree with Todd here. The word "brotherhood" is a little too
exclusive (We actually have female members in the GMLTC). I realize it would
be cool to follow along in the same vein as train unions, but I would suggest
something like IOLTC (International Organization of LEGO Train Clubs), or
ILTCO, or something along those lines.
-John
>
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) Oh, I like IOLTC myself. I also think that "Brotherhood" might not be the best way to go. I vote for IOLTC. Eric Kingsley (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) Wow, that's kind of surprising to hear. I've been meaning to ask, as this thread has unfolded... Are women allowed in LEGO train clubs, or is it a boys-only thing? --Todd (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
