Subject:
|
Re: IBLTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:56:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
524 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains.org, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.trains.org, Eric Kingsley writes:
>
> > So I hope I didn't misunderstand the purpose of IOLTC. I assume that it is
> > just going to be a place where groups can share experiances and ideas without
> > the worry about "Big Brother" looking over their shoulders.
>
> Well, in sub-threads like this one:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/trains/org/?n=1189
>
> it seems a lot like IOLTC, IBLTC, or ICLTC (whatever it ends up getting
> called) is going to be expected to "negotiate" with TLC, etc on behalf of its
> sub-groups.
>
> If that is going to be the case, NELUG should seriously discuss whether or not
> we want to join in such an endeavor.
I would agree. I things are still in the planning stage so I want to wait it
out but I don't think this new organization should or could negotiate flat deal
that would satisfy all regional organizaions.
I personally only want to do this for information sharing that can be used by
us to work out our own deals. If NELUG membership requires much more I would
say we're out.
>
> As I said, I have nothing against sharing info with other groups- in fact, I
> would love an environment that encouraged that kind of information sharing.
> But I wouldn't want to see NELUG tied to other groups more formally.
Agreed, many groups have many different philosophys about how to run their
group and anything that would endanger those philosophys I think would be
shunned. For example I would never say we should change our age limitation
because the larger group said we should, although I would be happy to explain
why we have the rule (to the smaller group so they can decide if it would work
for them).
I wouldn't worry to much yet. I won't be tieing us to anything. Actually if
you want to be the other representative on NELUG to keep me honest I would
appretiate it.
Eric Kingsley
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) Oh no, I know everything is still in the planning stages and just by talking about it NELUG isn't getting tied to anything further down the road... I just meant that *if* this is the way things are going to go, NELUG should discuss it in depth (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) Well, in sub-threads like this one: (URL) seems a lot like IOLTC, IBLTC, or ICLTC (whatever it ends up getting called) is going to be expected to "negotiate" with TLC, etc on behalf of its sub-groups. If that is going to be the case, NELUG (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
