Subject:
|
Re: IBLTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:11:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3567 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains.org, Eric Kingsley writes:
> I wouldn't worry to much yet. I won't be tieing us to anything.
Oh no, I know everything is still in the planning stages and just by talking
about it NELUG isn't getting tied to anything further down the road... I just
meant that *if* this is the way things are going to go, NELUG should discuss it
in depth before jumping in, that's all.
> Actually if
> you want to be the other representative on NELUG to keep me honest I would
> appretiate it.
Do we need two? I mean, I would be more than happy to help out, although I
seriously doubt we need to keep you honest. :D
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) I think we can wait and see on that. If every other group has 2 reps then we should probably have 2 but if one is all that is needed then I am happy to be that one. Eric Kingsley (26 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) I would agree. I things are still in the planning stage so I want to wait it out but I don't think this new organization should or could negotiate flat deal that would satisfy all regional organizaions. I personally only want to do this for (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
