Subject:
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:44:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
755 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> Some questions which I would like all LTDs (LEGO Train Dudes) to ponder
> and discuss:
>
> What if the guy/gal in charge of designing LEGO trains posted here and
> asked, "Should we continue to design LEGO trains 6 wide or begin to
> design them 8 wide?" What would be your response? Would you care
> necessarily? What if he/she also said, "We're also going to offer
> larger radius track curves, new points, DCC; eventually the works."
> Would that influence your preference between 6/8 wide?
For me the basic point comes down to size. My layout is 9 X 20 and to
increase it by 1/3 would mean I could never set all the modules up. Also as
Larry point out increased cost would slow down developement.
8 wides are great for models, 10 or 12 wides are probably even better, but
for an operating layout, 6 wide is the right size for me.
>
> Or, if TLC just out of the blue started producing 8 wide trains, how
> would you feel about it? Would you just accept it and build from there,
> or would you feel that 6 wide was better and consider it another bad
> move by TLC? Or would you just be happy that TLC was producing more
> trains again-- 6 wide, 8 wide--whatever?
If TLC started making 8 wide, sure buy it for the parts. Most of us buy JR
train for parts now and build our own.
>
> I have a sense of how people feel about the subject, but I wanted some
> direct feedback to see whether or not I am all wet. These are purely
> hypothetical questions:-)
>
> -John
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Hypothetically Speaking...
|
| (...) I just had a new thought I've not heard others mention. What if, instead of scaling up the trains to 8-wide, they scaled the track down to 6-wide? (!!!!!!) I just had the thought, so I don't know whether this would even work, but off the top (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Hypothetically Speaking...
|
| (...) Larry's all wet with his 1/3 this and 1/3 that blah blah. 8 wide trains are just that-- 2 studs wider than your trains-- that's all. Why ever would you think you'd need to increase the size of a huge layout like yours by a third???? But you (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Hypothetically Speaking...
|
| Some questions which I would like all LTDs (LEGO Train Dudes) to ponder and discuss: What if the guy/gal in charge of designing LEGO trains posted here and asked, "Should we continue to design LEGO trains 6 wide or begin to design them 8 wide?" What (...) (24 years ago, 9-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains) !
|
42 Messages in This Thread: ![Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (9-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Frank Buiting (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Frank Buiting (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -James Powell (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Kevin Maynes (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Mike Walsh (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -James Powell (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Frank Buiting (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Larry Pieniazek (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Larry Pieniazek (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John R. Clark (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -James Powell (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Charles Eric McCarthy (12-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -James Powell (12-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (12-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Kevin Wilson (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -James Powell (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Christopher Masi (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Tony Priestman (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Ross Crawford (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Matthew Greene (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Ross Crawford (12-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Tony Priestman (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Steve Chapple (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Tony Priestman (12-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Cary Clark (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Gerlach (10-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Larry Pieniazek (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -John Neal (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Harvey Henkelman (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Kim Toll (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Lawrence Wilkes (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Hypothetically Speaking... -Steve Demlow (11-Dec-00 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|