Subject:
|
Re: Hypothetically Speaking...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:25:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
696 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, SRC (<G5FCJJ.J68@lugnet.com>) wrote at 22:16:31
> In lugnet.trains, Tony Priestman writes:
> >
> > This was what I was thinking.
>
> I too was thinking this. Keep all the current compatibility with the
> 9V track, but add the occasional 8-wide model. Kevin's "BigRed" was
> a great high-light at our show, just sitting there on its own track segment
> looking good while all the various 6-wides ran around the layout.
>
> The UCS X-Wing is a bigger/better X-Wing model - why not do the same
> thing with train models? What's the sense in replacing when you can add?
So true.
All we are talking about here is a difference in the loading gauge. The
only incompatibility is trackside clearances. Model Trains would make an
excellent *addition* to the 9V Train theme.
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Hypothetically Speaking...
|
| (...) I too was thinking this. Keep all the current compatibility with the 9V track, but add the occasional 8-wide model. Kevin's "BigRed" was a great high-light at our show, just sitting there on its own track segment looking good while all the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
